Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 20;6(11):nzac144. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzac144

TABLE 5.

Ordinary least squares regressions of the Balanced Food Choice Index on 5 explanatory variables1

Model 12 Model 22 Model 33
Explanatory Variable Unit Coeff 95% CI P Value Coeff 95% CI P Value Coeff 95% CI P Value
Meat production GDP % −4.0** (1.6) −7.1, −0.9 0.013 −3.7* (2.1) −7.9, 0.5 0.082
Dairy production GDP % −2.0 (2.4) −6.7, 2.7 0.390 −1.0 (2.1) −5.1, 3.1 0.634
EPI 0–100 scale 0.5*** (0.1) 0.3, 0.8 0.000 0.3 (80.2) −0.2, 0.8 0.221
Last update FBDG Years 0.6 (0.5) −0.4, 1.5 0.244 0.4 (0.4) −0.4, 1.2 0.309 0.1 (0.6) −1.1, 1.4 0.811
Page length FBDG Square root of pages 2.9*** (0.5) 1.9, 4.0 0.000 2.8*** (0.5) 1.9, 3.8 0.000 3.0*** (0.4) 2.1, 3.8 0.000
Constant −1,094.6 (951.1) −2988.2, 799.0 0.253 −824.2 (790.8) −2394.4, 746.0 0.300 −293.7 (1235.4) −2754.1, 2166.8 0.813
Observations, n 83 98 82
R 2 0.4 0.4 0.4
1

Significance levels for the slope estimators for the 2-sided t test with null hypothesis = 0: *P < 0.1. **P < 0.05. ***P < 0.01. Coeff, regression coefficient; EPI, Environmental Performance Index; FBDG, food-based dietary guideline.

2

Models 1 and 2: regular SE in parentheses.

3

Model 3: White-Huber robust SE in parentheses.