Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2022 Jun 15;27(9):3875–3884. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01624-5

Alcohol use disorder is associated with DNA methylation-based shortening of telomere length and regulated by TESPA1: implications for aging

Jeesun Jung 1, Daniel L McCartney 2, Josephin Wagner 1, Daniel B Rosoff 1, Melanie Schwandt 3, Hui Sun 3, Corinde E Wiers 4, Luana Martins de Carvalho 4, Nora D Volkow 4, Rosie M Walker 2, Archie Campbell 2, David J Porteous 2, Andrew M McIntosh 2, Riccardo E Marioni 2, Steve Horvath 5,6, Kathryn L Evans 2, Falk W Lohoff 1,
PMCID: PMC9708583  PMID: 35705636

Abstract

Chronic heavy alcohol consumption is associated with increased mortality and morbidity and often leads to premature aging; however, the mechanisms of alcohol-associated cellular aging are not well understood. In this study, we used DNA methylation derived telomere length (DNAmTL) as a novel approach to investigate the role of alcohol use on the aging process. DNAmTL was estimated by 140 cytosine phosphate guanines (CpG) sites in 372 individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and 243 healthy controls (HC) and assessed using various endophenotypes and clinical biomarkers. Validation in an independent sample of DNAmTL on alcohol consumption was performed (N = 4219). Exploratory genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on DNAmTL were also performed to identify genetic variants contributing to DNAmTL shortening. Top GWAS findings were analyzed using in-silico expression quantitative trait loci analyses and related to structural MRI hippocampus volumes of individuals with AUD. DNAmTL was 0.11-kilobases shorter per year in AUD compared to HC after adjustment for age, sex, race, and blood cell composition (p = 4.0 × 10−12). This association was partially attenuated but remained significant after additionally adjusting for BMI, and smoking status (0.06 kilobases shorter per year, p = 0.002). DNAmTL shortening was strongly associated with chronic heavy alcohol use (ps < 0.001), elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (ps < 0.004). Comparison of DNAmTL with PCR-based methods of assessing TL revealed positive correlations (R = 0.3, p = 2.2 × 10−5), highlighting the accuracy of DNAmTL as a biomarker. The GWAS meta-analysis identified a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs4374022 and 18 imputed ones in Thymocyte Expressed, Positive Selection Associated 1(TESPA1), at the genome-wide level (p = 3.75 × 10−8). The allele C of rs4374022 was associated with DNAmTL shortening, lower hippocampus volume (p < 0.01), and decreased mRNA expression in hippocampus tissue (p = 0.04). Our study demonstrates DNAmTL-related aging acceleration in AUD and suggests a functional role for TESPA1 in regulating DNAmTL length, possibly via the immune system with subsequent biological effects on brain regions negatively affected by alcohol and implicated in aging.

Subject terms: Predictive markers, Molecular biology

Introduction

Chronic heavy alcohol consumption reduces life expectancy, leads to premature aging worldwide [13], and is associated with age-related diseases such as cardiometabolic diseases, cancer and decline in brain function [410]. It has been reported that individuals with heavier alcohol use among those with alcohol use disorder (AUD) have more pronounced age-related disease and accelerated biological aging compared to healthy individuals [11, 12]. Even though AUD and heavy alcohol consumption have been shown to be risk factors for premature aging, the underlying mechanisms between alcohol use and the aging process have not been well studied [13, 14].

An emerging biomarker of cellular aging is telomere length (TL), which has been associated with hypertension, diabetes, serious mental illnesses, and early mortality [5, 1416]. Telomeres are tandem repetitive nucleotide sequences at chromosome ends that play a critical role in facilitating complete chromosome replication. Telomeres protect genomic DNA against double-strand breaks and DNA end-joining and recombination. As a normal cellular process, a small portion of telomeric DNA is lost with each cell division [17]. TL shortens with natural aging because it is not fully replicated during every cell division, so TL has served as a biological marker to predict lifespan [18]. TL is influenced by genetics with a heritability of 34–82% [1922], and is associated with lifestyle factors, including cumulative stress exposures, smoking, alcohol use, and psychiatric disorders that may affect cell aging and induce damage to DNA [17, 23].

Although cellular TL shortening has been linked with AUD and other substance use disorders, the association with broader alcohol consumption phenotypes remains unclear [2326]. In addition, despite the importance of TL as a biomarker to illustrate a direct or indirect association with age-related traits and health complications, measuring TL remains challenging and subject to confounding factors, including DNA extraction methods and other technical variations [27].

In contrast to the classical approaches to measure TL, innovative methods utilizing DNA methylation are now available to predict TL [28]. Genome-wide DNA methylation (DNAm) profiling has been used in AUD populations [29, 30] and can be used to predict cellular DNA methylation telomere length (DNAmTL) [28]. In addition, DNAmTL is easier to measure compared to traditional polymer chain reaction (PCR)-based TL assessments and might be a more reliable biomarker tracking clinically important traits because methylation signatures might represent changes in transcriptional programs and reflect cumulative effects of exposures over time [28, 31, 32]. Moreover, DNAmTL correlates strongly with age and performs better in predicting lifespan, and also exhibits strong negative correlations with other epigenetic clocks, with proxied TL reduction corresponding to epigenetic age acceleration [28]. Similarly, DNAmTL is heritable (h2 ≈ 0.48) and differs across race and ethnicities [28]; however, little is known about the genetic architecture underlying DNAmTL.

In this study, we first aimed to investigate the relationship between AUD and DNAmTL shortening in the largest AUD cohort currently available. Furthermore, we investigated whether elevated liver function enzyme (LFE) biomarkers, as indicators of AUD severity, were associated with DNAmTL. Replication was performed in a large sample with a focus on alcohol consumption. Technical validity of DNAmTL was conducted by comparing DNAmTL to classic PCR-based methods. Given that aging is often associated with cognitive decline, memory loss and decreased hippocampal volumes, we also explored correlation of DNAmTL with hippocampal structure. The secondary aims of our study were to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on DNAmTL to identify genetic contributions to shortening in DNAmTL, and to conduct cis-expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analyses of top targets to explore biological relevance.

Materials and methods

Study participants

The sample consisted of 615 participants, 372 with AUD and 243 healthy controls (HC) recruited at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA. All study participants completed the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV-TR (SCID-IV) to determine an alcohol-dependence (AD)/AUD diagnosis. Given the overlap between the DSM-IV alcohol dependence criteria and the DSM-5 AUD criteria, all participants with AD also met criteria for AUD diagnosis. Participants provided a blood sample that was used for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis as well as genome-wide genotyping analysis and clinical biomarker collection, including LFE for gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Participants also completed self-report questionnaires, including the Timeline Followback (TLFB) [33], a measure of alcohol intake over the previous 90 days, and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) [34]. FTND scores range from 0 to 10 with participants scoring 0 indicating non-smokers, and those with scores >0 defined as smokers. All study participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and were compensated for their time. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the NIH.

DNA methylation measurements

DNA methylation levels from whole blood samples were assessed using an Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray (Illumina Inc., San Diego, California). We implemented a robust strategy to minimize the potential confounding influence of batch effects on the hypotheses tested in the data set. Prior to sample processing, all major potential sources of batch-based confounding were considered including sodium bisulfite modification batch (N = 96/plate) and microarray batch (N = 8/array). Within technical batches, experimental conditions as well as covariates were matched such that distributions in age, sex, race, and smoking status did not vary between primary experimental groups within a batch. As such, even with the presence of technical batch effects, the statistical interpretation of findings would remain unaffected. Following sample processing and array hybridization, we performed a batch correction using scale-based correction of type I and type II probes followed by using Minfi to correct background noise and WateRmelon for individual red and green channel quantile normalization prior to beta calculation using the Dasen method. Evaluation of red and green channel and beta frequency distributions between batches did not reveal significant cross batch effects and no further statistical manipulation of the data was deemed necessary. After methylated and unmethylated intensities were quantile-normalized, β-values were calculated using the ratio of intensities between methylated and unmethylated alleles. Relative proportions of 6 types of cells (granulocytes, monocytes, natural killer cells, B cells, CD4 + T cells, and CD8 + T cells) were estimated using the Houseman estimation [35]. The final methylome dataset consisted of β-values for 835,928 CpG sites for all 615 participants.

Calculating DNAm telomere length and statistical analysis

We estimated DNAm telomere length (DNAmTL) using a previously published weighted average of 140 CpG sites selected by regressing measured leukocyte telomere length (LTL—assessed by terminal restriction fragmentation) on blood methylation data of 2256 individuals [28]. The predicted LTL, DNAmTL, possesses the same units (kilobase per year) as that of mean terminal restriction fragments (TRF) measured by Southern blotting [28] and the estimated DNAmTL in our sample has the same unit. Age-adjusted DNAmTL was calculated by regressing DNAmTL on chronological age, with a negative value suggesting that TL is shorter than expected at a given age whereas a positive value suggests longer than expected [3639]. DNAmTL measures have been shown to significantly correlate with LTL measured with TRF in 12 independent cohorts (R = 0.4–0.5), indicating that it is an accurate alternative [28]. To validate the performance of DNAmTL in our sample, we also examined the correlation between DNAmTL and LTL measured by a ratio of the telomere (T) to albumin (S) ratio (T/S ratio) in 191 HC that did not meet DSM-IV alcohol dependence criteria.

To investigate differences in age-adjusted DNAmTL between AUD and HC and associations with alcohol consumption in the AUD cohort (i.e. number of heavy drinking days in a past 90 days), a linear model with adjustment of age, sex, race, AUD diagnosis, and estimated proportions of six blood cell types was used (basic model). The alcohol consumption variables were standardized (mean = 0, SD = 1) to improve interpretation of results from a different scale. The fully adjusted model included additional covariates for smoking status and body mass index (BMI), which are potential confounding factors influencing the aging process (full model). Additional linear models, with the aforementioned basic and full covariate structures, examined if the standardized alcohol-associated biomarkers (i.e. GGT, ALT, AST) were associated with age-adjusted DNAmTL. Furthermore, additional adjustment for comorbid substance use disorders and psychiatric disorders was performed in the basic model. There was no evidence to suggest a non-Gaussian distribution of the residuals from the basic and full models (Shapiro-Wilk test, p > 0.05). As other drug use disorders may be associated with DNAmTL shortening, we conducted a sensitivity analysis by removing individuals with any comorbid drug dependences in AUD and compared the results to those with AUD with any comorbid substance use disorder. Statistical analyses were performed in R version 4.0.5 [40].

GWAS analysis for DNAm telomere length

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed in European Ancestry (EA) and African Ancestry (AA) participants separately with the Illumina OmniExpress and Illumina OmniExpressExome BeadChips (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and the imputed genotypes. The imputation of EA and AA was carried out separately by Minimac4 [41] using 1000 Genomes phase 3 panels as a reference sample [42]. To obtain ancestry/race information, we ran EIGENSTRAT [43] and conducted a population stratification analysis using the genome-wide data of all participants and 2504 individuals of the 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3.

Based on the genetically-identified EA and AA individuals with all imputed genotypes, we conducted a series of quality control (QC) procedures within each race group including: imputation accuracy (R2 > 0.7), sex check by X chromosome, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test in a control sample in EA and AA separately (P > 10−5), SNP genotyping rate (>0.99) and missingness by subjects (<0.03), and minor allele frequency (MAF) over 1%. The final sample size for the GWAS analyses after QC procedure was 297 in EA and 280 in AA. The total number of SNPs tested in the GWAS was 8,640,517 for EA and 14,892,985 for AA.

A linear regression model was utilized to test for association between each SNP and DNAmTL after adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, BMI, blood cell counts, and AUD diagnosis. All analyses were performed in EA and AA individuals separately with an additive genetic model. We then carried out a meta-analysis with a fixed-effect model weighted by inverse variance using the GWAS results of EA and AA samples using METAL [44]. SNPs that had substantial heterogeneity across the two GWAS results (Cochran’s Q test p-value <0.05 and heterogeneity index I2 > 75%) were removed. The total number of SNPs for the GWAS meta-analysis was 7,230,852. The threshold for the GWAS significant SNPs was set at P < 5 × 10−8. All genetic analyses were conducted using PLINK 1.90 software.

In silico functional analyses and neuroimaging hippocampus volume data

Given that a SNP in TESPA1 was a top finding in the meta GWAS and TESPA1 is highly expressed in hippocampus and cerebral cortex regions (www.proteinatlas.org [45]), we performed a cis-expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis for TESPA1 to examine correlation between the top variant and the transcript expression level in hippocampus tissue. We used the Brain Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTL) Almanac (BRAINEAC) database [46], where the transcripts and exon-specific expression data were available across 10 brain regions from 134 neurologically normal European subjects.

Structural neuroimaging of MRI

A subset of our AUD participants (n = 144) completed a structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan study. Hippocampus volumes were measured using the standard Freesurfer (version 5.3.0; surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) pipeline [47]. The individual T1-weighted images were automatically segmented to measure gray matter volume of structures [48] using the following steps: The images were resampled to 1 mm3 voxels and transformed to Talairach space; the intensity non-uniformity was corrected [49]; the skull was stripped from the images [50]; and finally auto-segmentation was performed with labels assigned based on probabilistic location of structures. We conducted a reliability test by examining a random number of the auto-segmented volumes from FreeSurfer’s QA Tools. This included checking for outliers, calculating signal-to-noise ratio, and visually examining generated snapshots of brain volume segmentation. Hippocampus volumes were analyzed using a linear model with the full model additional adjustment for estimated Total Intracranial Volume (eTIV).

Replication studies with Generation Scotland (GS): Scottish Family Health Study

Generation Scotland (GS) is a family-structured, population-based cohort study of over 24,000 people from across Scotland, aged between 18 and 99 years at the study baseline (2006–2011). A broad set of phenotype data were collected at baseline and data linkage to electronic health records has enabled follow-up to collect information on incident disease outcomes. Full details have been reported previously [51, 52]. DNA was obtained from whole blood in ~20,000 people at the study baseline and alcohol consumption was measured for the week prior to sampling. Of the participants reporting normal levels of alcohol consumption relative to a typical week, 4219 also had DNA methylation data, processed in two sets. For set 1, a genetic relationship matrix was built using GCTA-GRM, and a relatedness coefficient of <0.025 was specified to exclude related individuals and we used only unrelated subject (n = 1501). Set 2 are unrelated (genetic relatedness <0.05) to each other, and to the participants from Set 1 (n = 2718). The quality control steps for Set 1 and Set 2 were nearly identical to one another and full details have been reported previously. More detailed descriptions are included in the Supplementary Methods. All statistical analyses were performed as per the discovery analyses, with additional adjustment of 20 genetic principal components.

Results

Study participant characteristics are described in Supplementary Table S1. Participants with AUD and HC differed significantly in chronological age (p < 0.0001) and AUD cases were older with a mean age of 44.5 years (SD = 11). AUD cases had a higher proportion of males (p = 0.005) and smokers (p < 0.0001), but neither group differed in race/ancestry. Individuals with AUD had increased LFTs and heavier clinical alcohol consumptions than the HC group (p < 0.0001). The comorbidity rates of five illicit drug dependences (opioid, cocaine, cannabis etc.), MDD, and any anxiety disorder between AUD and HC were different (p < 0.01) (Supplementary Table S1). Importantly, we validated that DNAmTL was significantly correlated with LTL among 191 HC from our sample (R = 0.3, p = 2.2 × 10−5 in Fig. S1), which confirms the usefulness of DNAmTL as a proxy to study TL-related traits.

Association of DNAm telomere length with clinical phenotypes

DNAmTL decreased with age more rapidly in AUD than HC (Fig. 1A) and the age-adjusted DNAmTL was 0.11 kilobases/yr shorter in AUD cases compared to HC in the basic model (Fig. 1B, β = −0.11, p = 4.0 × 10−12). The decreased DNAmTL in AUD remained significant after additional adjustment for smoking status, BMI, and estimated blood cell proportions (β = −0.06, p = 0.002). Consistently, we found that DNAmTL was negatively associated with clinical measures of alcohol consumptions; DNAmTL was shortened by 0.04 kilobases/yr for every standard deviation (SD = 8.2) of drinks per day in the past 90-days (Table 1, β = −0.04; p = 2.1 × 10−6). The negative association remained significant in the full model (β = −0.03; p = 0.0002). Increased total drinks and heavy drinking days were also negatively correlated with DNAmTL (β = −0.04, ps < 0.001). The accelerated DNAmTL shortening was related to an increased number of drinking days and alcohol dependence scale (ADS) score only in the basic model (p < 0.05). Further analysis revealed that elevated GGT and AST were associated with shortened DNAmTL (β = −0.02; ps < 0.005) in both models even after adjusting for multiple testing. These negative associations were also present within AUD cases (Table S2). Sensitivity analysis showed that after removing all comorbid substance use disorders (SUD) among individuals with AUD, the results were attenuated, likely due to reduced sample size and phenotype variability. In contrast, individuals with AUD and comorbid SUD had stronger associations between DNAmTL and drinking variables/GGT suggesting that phenotype severity/heterogeneity contributes to shortened DNAmTL (Table S3). Sex-specific analysis exhibited that males had stronger association between DNAmTL shortening and alcohol use as well as liver function enzyme abnormalities, while females had associations of DNAmTL with mainly alcohol use (Table S4). Additional adjustment for comorbid psychiatric disorders such as either/both drug dependences and mood disorders did not change our main findings of the association between alcohol and DNAmTL shortening (Table S5). Furthermore, the replication study with the two datasets of Generation Scotland (GS) cohort showed that increased weekly alcohol use was associated with shortened DNAmTL (β = −0.002, p < 10−5, Table 1) in both models.

Fig. 1. Association of age-adjusted DNAmTL with alcohol use disorder.

Fig. 1

A The scatter plot describes the DNAmTL with a linear fit at AUD and HC respectively. Individuals with AUD had rapid decrease in DNAmTL comparing to HC. B The bar plots show estimated means of the Age-adjusted DNAmTL after controlling for sex, race, six blood cell counts (basic model). The DNAmTL differed significantly between AUD cases and HC (β = −0.11 kilobases per year, p= 4.0 × 10−12).

Table 1.

Association of DNAmTL with alcohol use and liver function enzyme biomarkers.

Basic model Full model
β SE P-value β SE P-value
NIAAA sample
Total drinks −0.042 0.008 3.2 × 10−7 −0.031 0.008 0.0001
No of drinking days −0.023 0.010 0.03 −0.010 0.010 0.34
Average drinks per day −0.040 0.008 2.1 × 10−8 −0.030 0.008 0.0002
Heavy drinking days −0.039 0.011 0.0002 −0.022 0.011 0.04
ADS score −0.003 0.001 0.004 −0.002 0.001 0.023
GGT −0.020 0.007 0.003 −0.021 0.006 0.002
ALT −0.008 0.007 0.25 −0.006 0.007 0.36
AST −0.019 0.007 0.005 −0.018 0.007 0.005
GS sample of unit of weekly alcohol use
Data set1 (n = 1501) −0.0017 0.00032 2.09 × 10−7 −0.0009 0.00032 0.003
Data set2 (n = 2718) −0.0018 0.00025 1.44 × 10−12 −0.0012 0.00025 4.64 × 10−6

AUD alcohol use disorder, GGT gamma-glutamyl transferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ADS Alcohol Dependence Scale, Heavy drinking days are defined as ≥4 drinks a day for females; ≥5 drinks a day for males. Models were adjusted for age, gender, race, AUD diagnosis, six blood cell counts in the basic model, and additionally adjusted for smoking status, and body mass index in the full model, NIAAA National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, GS Generation Scotland cohort.

Bold values indicate statistical significance P < 0.05.

GWAS of age-adjusted DNAm telomere length

Each Manhattan plot of EA and AA GWAS results is shown separately in Supplementary Figs. S23 and Table S67. We found no evidence for genomic inflation in each EA (λGC = 1.01) and AA studies (λGC = 1.04). We then removed SNPs that had substantial heterogeneity between the GWAS results of EA and AA (I2 > 75, P < 0.05). The total number of SNPs for meta GWAS analysis was 7,230,852. Interestingly, at the genome-wide significant level, meta-analysis of GWAS for DNAmTL showed that the intronic SNP, rs4374022 in TESPA1 was significantly associated with DNAmTL shortening by 0.058 kilobases per year (p = 3.9 × 10−8) with each additional copy of the major allele C (Figs. 2A, B, 3A, Table 2) and the additional 18 imputed SNPs in high LD with rs4374022 in TESPA1 were observed at the genome-wide level (Table 2).

Fig. 2. Cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analyses of DNAmTL identifies TESPA1.

Fig. 2

A Manhattan plot shows the meta-analysis P-values combining the results of EA and AA GWAS based on a fixed effect model using weight of inverse variance. EA and AA studies comprised of 297 EA and 280 AA individuals. The y-axis reports -log transformed Meta P-values. The horizontal dashed line corresponds to the genome-wide association threshold (p = 5.0 × 10−8). All SNPs in TESPA1 were colored with red. B Regional association plot of TESPA1 associated with DNAmTL shortening. The y-axis shows the -log-transformed meta-analysis P-value. The colors represent linkage disequilibrium (LD) R2 in European Ancestry Sample.

Fig. 3. Association of TESPA1 rs4374022 with hippocampus volumes and mRNA expression.

Fig. 3

A The bar plot shows estimated means of Age-adjusted DNAmTL adjusted for sex, race, blood cell proportions, BMI, and smoking status in all samples combined. Age-adjusted DNAmTL differed significantly between genotype groups (p = 3.75 × 10−8). Effect allele C of genome-wide significant SNP rs4374022 is associated with DNAmTL shortening by 0.058 kilobases per year, the y-axis is age-adjusted DNAmTL and the x-axis describes the genotype group of rs4374022. B Box plot shows association of TESPA1 mRNA expression in the hippocampus brain tissue across genotype groups (p = 0.04), The effect allele C is associated with decreased mRNA expression. The y-axis is a log2 transformed expression scale. C, D The bar plots show estimated means left and right hippocampus volumes among AUD sample. C Decreased left hippocampus volumes is associated with the number of allele C (additive effect: p = 0.002), D Decreased right hippocampus volumes is associated with the number of allele C (additive effect: p = 0.01).

Table 2.

GWAS meta-analysis of DNAmTL derived from participants of European Ancestry and African Ancestry.

SNP CHR BP Effect allelea META EA AA Gene or nearest gene
BETA (EFFECT) Meta P-value P (I2) MAF (MA) Association P-value MAF(MA) Association P-value
Genotyped SNPs (p < 1 × 10−5)
rs4374022 12 55,373,780 C −0.058 3.87E−08 0.81(0) 0.22(T) 0.00014 0.48 (T) 0.00012 TESPA1
rs3759165 12 55,367,715 C −0.054 2.23E−07 0.63 (0) 0.22 (T) 0.00016 0.46 (C) 0.0005 TESPA1
rs2147317 1 68,990,012 C −0.052 1.17E−06 0.65 (0) 0.35 (C) 0.00058 0.25 (C) 0.00072 DEPDC1-AS1
rs8128746 21 19,656,171 C −0.049 1.84E−06 0.61 (0) 0.43 (C) 9.24E-05 0.28 (C) 0.0073 TMPRSS15
rs7297842 12 55,404,523 A −0.050 3.25E−06 0.36 (0) 0.21 (G) 0.00017 0.47 (A) 0.0051 TESPA1; NEUROD4
rs842192 1 1.78E + 08 C −0.055 4.47E−06 0.99 (0) 0.13 (A) 0.0082 0.34 (A) 0.0002 SEC16B
rs3776566 5 36,631,733 G −0.061 5.48E−06 0.75 (0) 0.05 (T) 0.02 0.29 (T) 0.0001 SLC1A3
rs6682188 1 68,984,394 T −0.055 5.79E−06 0.65 (0) 0.18 (T) 0.0026 0.21 (T) 0.0008 DEPDC1-AS1
rs17082453 4 54,011,603 T −0.109 5.84E−06 0.57 (0) 0.07 (T) 0.00072 0.03 (T) 0.0027 SCFD2
rs7259473 19 39,493,010 G −0.045 7.31E−06 0.63 (0) 0.49 (G) 0.0026 0.33 (G) 0.001 FBXO17;FBXO27
rs3851604 12 55,381,991 G −0.049 7.33E−06 0.30 (6.1) 0.21 (A) 0.00017 0.45 (A) 0.01 TESPA1;NEUROD4
rs2477083 1 68,921,521 G −0.055 7.56E−06 0.55 (0) 0.14 (G) 0.00039 0.23 (G) 0.006 RPE65;DEPDC1
rs4738003 8 70,542,552 C −0.045 7.77E−06 0.70 (0) 0.48 (C) 0.00038 0.31 (C) 0.0077 SULF1
rs2555454 2 64,522,307 A −0.054 8.23E−06 0.12 (58.4) 0.31 (A) 0.0055 0.12 (A) 0.00018 LOC100507006; MIR4433B
rs7978952 12 55,397,643 T −0.047 9.44E−06 0.27 (18.9) 0.22 (C) 0.00015 0.39 (T) 0.014 TESPA1;NEUROD4
Imputed SNPs (p < 5 × 10−8\)
rs1408065 6 133,192,978 A −0.071 4.49E−08 0.51(0) 0.24(A) 5.56E-07 0.08(A) 0.04293 RPS12;LINC00326
rs7973023 12 55,357,264 C −0.059 1.95E−08 0.59(0) 0.23(T) 3.53E-05 0.47(C) 0.000204 TESPA1
rs7973141 12 55,357,382 C −0.059 2.24E−08 0.65(0) 0.23(T) 5.03E-05 0.47(C) 0.000171 TESPA1
rs7973347 12 55,357,387 G −0.059 2.24E−08 0.65(0) 0.23(C) 5.03E-05 0.47(G) 0.000171 TESPA1
rs12301448 12 55,358,691 T −0.058 2.76E−08 0.60(0) 0.23(C) 4.91E-05 0.46(T) 0.000207 TESPA1
rs1532052 12 55,361,314 A −0.058 2.03E−08 0.70(0) 0.23(G) 6.94E-05 0.46(A) 0.000115 TESPA1
rs10783706 12 55,362,002 G −0.058 2.45E−08 0.81(0) 0.23(A) 0.000118 0.46(G) 8.51E−05 TESPA1
rs10876674 12 55,362,156 C −0.057 4.60E−08 0.75(0) 0.23(T) 0.000118 0.46(C) 0.000153 TESPA1
rs10876678 12 55,369,024 A −0.059 2.07E−08 0.98(0) 0.24(G) 0.000163 0.47(G) 5.43E−05 TESPA1
rs1565170 12 55,369,858 C −0.061 7.29E−09 0.96(0) 0.23(T) 0.000118 0.44(T) 2.72E−05 TESPA1
rs1565171 12 55,369,960 C −0.061 7.29E−09 0.96(0) 0.23(A) 0.000118 0.44(A) 2.72E−05 TESPA1
rs1565172 12 55,370,164 C −0.061 7.29E−09 0.96(0) 0.23(T) 0.000118 0.44(T) 2.72E−05 TESPA1
rs7314905 12 55,370,782 G −0.058 4.71E−08 0.80(0) 0.23(C) 0.000135 0.47(C) 0.000141 TESPA1
rs7314940 12 55,370,948 C −0.059 3.39E−08 0.88(0) 0.23(T) 0.000135 0.42(T) 0.000104 TESPA1
rs10876679 12 55,371,263 C −0.061 8.56E−09 0.96(0) 0.23(A) 0.000135 0.43(A) 2.80E−05 TESPA1
rs7315419 12 55,371,307 C −0.061 8.53E−09 0.96(0) 0.23(G) 0.000135 0.43(G) 2.78E−05 TESPA1
rs2046686 12 55,371,671 C −0.061 8.53E−09 0.96(0) 0.23(T) 0.000135 0.43(T) 2.78E−05 TESPA1
rs11171205 12 55,372,239 A −0.058 4.71E−08 0.80(0) 0.23(G) 0.000135 0.47(G) 0.000141 TESPA1
rs1488039 12 55,373,112 G −0.058 4.71E−08 0.80(0) 0.23(A) 0.000135 0.47(A) 0.000141 TESPA1

EA European Ancestry participants, AA Africa Ancestry participants, META GWAS meta-analysis, CHR chromosome, BP base pair (physical location) on genome (hg19), MAF minor allele frequency, P-value present refers to association test with EAA. I2 (P) heterogeneity index with P-value, TESPA1 Thymocyte Expressed, Positive Selection Associated 1, SLC1A3 solute carrier family 1 member 3, DEPDC1-AS1 DEP Domain Containing 1-Antisense RNA 1, TMPRSS15 Transmembrane Serine Protease 15, SULF1 Sulfatase 1, NPHP3 Nephrocystin 3, ACAD11 Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Family Member 11, SEC16B SEC16 Homolog B, Endoplasmic Reticulum Export Factor, SCFD2 Sec1 Family Domain Containing.

aEffect Allele corresponds to the effect size’s sign; it may not be the minor allele.

Cis-eQTL analysis using BRAINEAC expression data showed that the C allele (AF = 78% in EA, 52% in AA) of the genome-wide significant SNP, rs4374022 associated with a higher DNAmTL shortening rate also had a significant association with decreased TESPA1 mRNA expression in hippocampal tissue from postmortem brains (Fig. 3B, β = −0.37, p = 0.04). The structural neuroimaging analysis also showed that the C allele was correlated with smaller left and right hippocampus volumes in the AUD sample (p < 0.01, Fig. 3C, D). Given that TESPA1 SNP rs4374022 was associated with DNAm TL shortening and smaller hippocampus volumes and decreased mRNA expression in BRAINEAC data, further analysis revealed that DNAmTL shortening among AUD cases was also related to reduced volumes in hippocampus (Fig. 4A, B, β = 5.6 × 105, p < 0.05), a key brain region implicated in aging-associated cognitive decline [53, 54].

Fig. 4. Association of DNAmTL with hippocampus volumes among individuals with AUD.

Fig. 4

A Correlations between age-adjusted DNAmTL and left hippocampus volume among AUD (n = 144). The line was a linear fit which age-adjusted DNAmTL was regressed on left hippocampus volume (β = 5.6 × 10−5, p = 0.02) after adjusting for sex, race, blood cell counts, smoking status, BMI, and eTIV. B Correlations between age-adjusted DNAmTL and right hippocampus volume. The line was a linear fit which DNAmTL was regressed on right hippocampus volume (β = 4.5 × 10−5, p = 0.07) in the full model with additional adjustment for eTIV.

Discussion

This is the first study using DNAmTL to investigate the impact of AUD and alcohol-associated clinical phenotypes on TL-related biological aging. Our study revealed that cellular aging as indicated by DNAmTL shortening, is accelerated in the AUD group compared to HC (0.11 kilobases per year shorter in AUD, p= 4.0 × 10−12). Additionally, we found significant associations between DNAmTL shortening and heavy alcohol consumption measured by average drinks per day, the number of heavy drinking days, and total drinks in past 90 days (Table 1, ps < 0.001) suggesting a dose-response relationship. Further clinical analyses substantiated our findings and showed that DNAmTL shortening was significantly associated with elevated GGT and AST, clinical measures that often indicate a more severe AUD phenotype or worse disease progression [8, 55, 8, 56]. These findings are in line with previous studies that show more severe AUD phenotypes are associated with accelerated biological aging [11, 12] and brain aging [57]. Importantly, findings were replicated in a general population showing that alcohol consumption is associated with shortened DNAmTL.

While previous reports have shown an association of shortened TL in AUD [23, 58, 59], we used a novel approach to predict TL via DNA methylation. To confirm the validity of this approach, we compared DNAmTL with conventionally measured TL in a subset of our NIAAA sample and found positive correlations (Fig. S1, R = 0.3, p = 2.2 × 10−05). Lu et al. [28] found that DNAmTL outperformed TL in showing stronger associations with age, sex, ethnicity, lifestyle factors (i.e., smoking, BMI, etc.) and several clinical biomarkers. In addition, DNAmTL had a better predictive power than TL in capturing a correlation between time to death and time to coronary heart disease or heart failure, as well as age-at-menopause and dietary factors [28]. Considering the technical complexities of traditional TL assessments, DNAmTL is more robust and cost-effective for studying age-related health outcomes [28] and captures more biological variation of blood cell counts and is more strongly related to biomarkers of immunosenescence than measured TL [28]. DNAmTL is also an important epigenetic biomarker, which captures additional aspects of molecular aging, in particular the link between cell replication and age-related diseases. Importantly, the 140 CpGs we used to predict DNAmTL did not overlap with any previously identified alcohol-related CpGs (2504 CpGs for alcohol consumption [60], 96 for AUD [29]), reducing the likelihood that alcohol might have a confounding influence on measuring methylation-based TL.

To further elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and genetic factors contributing to DNAmTL shortening in AUD [61], we conducted GWAS on DNAmTL. Our GWAS meta-analyses identified a genome-wide significant SNP rs4374022 and several suggestive SNPs in TESPA1, which is highly expressed in several brain regions (https://www.proteinatlas.org). TESPA1 is involved in the development and maturation of T-cells and plays a critical role in immune defects in the elderly [62]. Furthermore, animal models have shown that TESPA1-knockout mice (Tespa1−/−, KO) exhibit more severe inflammation [63]. Given that a critical component of aging is a set of functional and structural changes in the immune system that manifests in reduced B and T cell production [62], genetic variation in TESPA1 might influence the aging process. This hypothesis is intriguing as TESPA1 has also been identified as one of the top ten differentially expressed genes in a recent study investigating differential gene expression Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (compared to healthy controls) in several brain regions [64]. Furthermore, TESPA1 is involved in the Ca2+ transfer from endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to mitochondria (MT) [65]. The molecular interactions between ER and mitochondria membrane, referred as the MT-ER contacts, may play a crucial role in aging and in the development of aging-associated diseases derived from mitochondrial dysfunction as consequences of oxidative stress [6668]. Genetic variation in TESPA1 might further influence the effects of heavy alcohol consumptions on immune and mitochondrial function, but additional studies are needed to substantiate this hypothesis.

Biological validation and follow-up analyses using our structural neuroimaging data and cis-eQTL data showed that the genome-wide significant TESPA1 SNP, rs4374022, was also associated with decreased hippocampal volumes and reduced mRNA expression in hippocampal tissue from postmortem brain. This is the first evidence that TESPA1 might be associated with brain volume regulation, possibly via regulation of the immune system such as modulating T-cell infiltration in hippocampus [69]. This finding is intriguing as genes regulating the immune system have been implicated in cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease [7072].

In line with our finding that genetic variation in TESPA1 was associated with decreased mRNA expression in hippocampus, we observed that DNAmTL shortening was associated in general with reduced hippocampal volume among AUD cases (Fig. 4, p < 0.05). While several brain regions have been shown to be associated with AUD and aging, the hippocampus is one of the brain regions most affected by aging and the volume loss is estimated to reach up to 35% over the age range of 30–90 years [73]. Alcohol misuse might accelerate hippocampal volume loss and lead to cognitive decline over time [74]. While the exact mechanisms of brain volumes loss due to heavy alcohol exposure are unknown, our findings suggest that aging-related changes in the immune system regulated via TESPA1 in conjunction with heavy alcohol use might lead to advanced cellular aging, structural brain changes, and subsequent cognitive declines. Future studies might be necessary to investigate these possibilities. The Meta-Analysis Gene-set Enrichment of Variant Association (MAGENTA) analysis [75] was used to compare the results of GWAS meta-analysis with gene sets of pre-specified pathways related to aging and addiction, showing the top 5% findings involved in the pathological mechanism of alcoholism and other addictions and of disorders of dopaminergic and serotonergic pathways (Table S8). Our top 25% findings significantly exhibited more gene enrichments in long-term depression and drug addictions pathways. The findings imply that the suggestive variants may be polygenic and relevant to shared functional biological pathways with the aging process in addiction.

Our study has several strengths, including a well-characterized sample and replication cohort, enabling us to conduct various endophenotypic analyses, including degree of disease severity analyses. In addition to enrichment of clinical phenotypes, structural neuroimaging data added power to validate biological function. Second, all our findings exhibited consistent support in downstream biological analyses. The variant contributing to DNAmTL shortening also showed loss of hippocampus volume and decreased mRNA expression, which could help elucidate the relationship between the neuronal immune system and biological aging. Despite the strengths, our findings do not demonstrate whether AUD is a predisposing factor for shortened DNAmTL or if it is a consequence of chronic heavy alcohol use. To address this limitation of our cross-sectional study, future studies could consider collections of methylation data at the multiple time points to investigate the effect of long-term alcohol use on DNAmTL shortening [76]. Furthermore, our study was limited in collecting data on other environmental factors such as exercise and diet that may influence DNA methylation levels of telomere length and were not included in the analyses, although we accounted for age, sex, race, smoking status, and BMI. Our study had adequate power to detect the association of DNAmTL with alcohol drinking behaviors, but was underpowered for each ancestry-specific GWAS. Our cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis identified genome-wide significant variants associated with acceleration in DNAmTL shortening, although we failed to replicate our findings in the GS cohorts, likely due to differences in sample characteristics including phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity [77]. Future studies may be needed to detect additional common and rare functional variants with large effects in a cross-ancestry GWAS setting.

In conclusion, DNAmTL shortening was associated with AUD and heavy alcohol consumption behaviors including alcohol-related clinical endophenotypes. In addition, we identified an association between TESPA1 and DNAmTL shortening processes, indicating a potential role of the immune system on biological aging. Further important lines of investigation include the analysis of shared mechanisms underlying heavy alcohol use and age-related DNAmTL, which could lead to novel methods for detection and treatment of aging-related morbidities.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (139.1KB, docx)

Author contributions

Conception and design of the work: FWL. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: JJ, DM, FWL. FWL and JJ drafted and revised the paper. All authors critically reviewed the content of the paper, provided critical revisions, and approved the final version for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) intramural funding [ZIA-AA000242 to FWL]; Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). The GS DNA methylation profiling and analysis was supported by Wellcome Investigator Award 220857/Z/20/Z and Grant 104036/Z/14/Z (PI: AM McIntosh) and through funding from NARSAD (Ref: 27404; awardee: Dr DM Howard) and the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (Sim Fellowship; Awardee: Dr HC Whalley).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41380-022-01624-5.

References

  • 1.Griswold MG, Fullman N, Hawley C, Arian N, Zimsen SRM, Tymeson HD, et al. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392:1015–35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31310-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Udo T, Vasquez E, Shaw BA. A lifetime history of alcohol use disorder increases risk for chronic medical conditions after stable remission. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;157:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Westman J, Wahlbeck K, Laursen TM, Gissler M, Nordentoft M, Hallgren J, et al. Mortality and life expectancy of people with alcohol use disorder in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015;131:297–306. doi: 10.1111/acps.12330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koh SH, Choi SH, Jeong JH, Jang JW, Park KW, Kim EJ, et al. Telomere shortening reflecting physical aging is associated with cognitive decline and dementia conversion in mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease. Aging-Us. 2020;12:4407–23. doi: 10.18632/aging.102893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lindqvist D, Epel ES, Mellon SH, Penninx BW, Revesz D, Verhoeven JE, et al. Psychiatric disorders and leukocyte telomere length: Underlying mechanisms linking mental illness with cellular aging. Neurosci Biobehav R. 2015;55:333–64. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ma HX, Zhou ZY, Wei S, Liu ZS, Pooley KA, Dunning AM, et al. Shortened Telomere Length Is Associated with Increased Risk of Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Plos One. 2011;6:e20466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nilsson PM, Tufvesson H, Leosdottir M, Melander O. Telomeres and cardiovascular disease risk: an update 2013. Transl Res. 2013;162:371–80. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2013.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rosoff DB, Charlet K, Jung J, Lee J, Muench C, Luo A, et al. Association of High-Intensity Binge Drinking With Lipid and Liver Function Enzyme Levels. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e195844. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rosoff DB, Smith GD, Mehta N, Clarke TK, Lohoff FW. Evaluating the relationship between alcohol consumption, tobacco use, and cardiovascular disease: A multivariable Mendelian randomization study. Plos Med. 2020;17:e1003410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang JQ, Liu YR, Xia QR, Xia Q, Wang BS, Yang CC, et al. Potential roles of telomeres and telomerase in neurodegenerative diseases. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;163:1060–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Luo A, Jung J, Longley M, Rosoff DB, Charlet K, Muench C, et al. Epigenetic aging is accelerated in alcohol use disorder and regulated by genetic variation in APOL2. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;45:327–36. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0500-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rosen AD, Robertson KD, Hlady RA, Muench C, Lee J, Philibert R, et al. DNA methylation age is accelerated in alcohol dependence. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8:182. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0233-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lohoff FW. Pharmacotherapies and personalized medicine for alcohol use disorder: a review. Pharmacogenomics. 2020;21:1117–38. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2020-0079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang JF, Dong X, Cao L, Sun YY, Qiu Y, Zhang Y, et al. Association between telomere length and diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2016;44:1156–73. doi: 10.1177/0300060516667132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xu C, Wang ZQ, Su XQ, Da M, Yang ZC, Duan WW, et al. Association between leucocyte telomere length and cardiovascular disease in a large general population in the United States. Sci Rep. 2020;10:80. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57050-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhao JZ, Miao K, Wang HR, Ding H, Wang DW. Association between Telomere Length and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis. Plos One. 2013;8:e79993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shammas MA. Telomeres, lifestyle, cancer, and aging. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2011;14:28–34. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32834121b1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen BH, Carty CL, Kimura M, Kark JD, Chen W, Li SX, et al. Leukocyte telomere length, T cell composition and DNA methylation age. Aging-Us. 2017;9:1983–95. doi: 10.18632/aging.101293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Armanios M. Telomeres and age-related disease: how telomere biology informs clinical paradigms. J Clin Investig. 2013;123:996–1002. doi: 10.1172/JCI66370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Broer L, Codd V, Nyholt DR, Deelen J, Mangino M, Willemsen G, et al. Meta-analysis of telomere length in 19 713 subjects reveals high heritability, stronger maternal inheritance and a paternal age effect. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:1163–8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hjelmborg JB, Dalgard C, Moller S, Steenstrup T, Kimura M, Christensen K, et al. The heritability of leucocyte telomere length dynamics. J Med Genet. 2015;52:297–302. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Honig LS, Kang MS, Cheng R, Eckfeldt JH, Thyagarajan B, Leiendecker-Foster C, et al. Heritability of telomere length in a study of long-lived families. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36:2785–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.de Carvalho LM, Wiers CE, Manza P, Sun H, Schwandt M, Wang GJ, et al. Effect of alcohol use disorder on cellular aging. Psychopharmacology. 2019;236:3245–55. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05281-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dixit S, Whooley MA, Vittinghoff E, Roberts JD, Heckbert SR, Fitzpatrick AL, et al. Alcohol consumption and leukocyte telomere length. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38904-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Navarro-Mateu F, Husky M, Cayuela-Fuentes P, Alvarez FJ, Roca-Vega A, Rubio-Aparicio M, et al. The association of telomere length with substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Addiction. 2021;116:1954–72. doi: 10.1111/add.15312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Strandberg TE, Strandberg AY, Saijonmaa O, Tilvis RS, Pitkala KH, Fyhrquist F. Association between alcohol consumption in healthy midlife and telomere length in older men. The Helsinki Businessmen Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27:815–22. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9728-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Montpetit AJ, Alhareeri AA, Montpetit M, Starkweather AR, Elmore LW, Filler K, et al. Telomere Length A Review of Methods for Measurement. Nurs Res. 2014;63:289–99. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lu AT, Seeboth A, Tsai PC, Sun D, Quach A, Reiner AP, et al. DNA methylation-based estimator of telomere length. Aging (Albany NY) 2019;11:5895–923. doi: 10.18632/aging.102173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lohoff FW, Roy A, Jung J, Longley M, Rosoff DB, Luo A, et al. Epigenome-wide association study and multi-tissue replication of individuals with alcohol use disorder: evidence for abnormal glucocorticoid signaling pathway gene regulation. Mol Psychiatr. 2021;26:2224–37. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0734-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lohoff FW, Sorcher JL, Rosen AD, Mauro KL, Fanelli RR, Momenan R, et al. Methylomic profiling and replication implicates deregulation of PCSK9 in alcohol use disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:1–11. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lu AT, Quach A, Wilson JG, Reiner AP, Aviv A, Raj K, et al. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY) 2019;11:303–27. doi: 10.18632/aging.101684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lu AT, Xue L, Salfati EL, Chen BH, Ferrucci L, Levy D, et al. GWAS of epigenetic aging rates in blood reveals a critical role for TERT. Nat Commun. 2018;9:387. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02697-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sobell LC, Sobell MB Timeline Follow-Back. In: Litten RZ, Allen JP, editors. Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biochemical Methods. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1992, pp 41–72.
  • 34.Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86:1119–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Houseman EA, Kile ML, Christiani DC, Ince TA, Kelsey KT, Marsit CJ. Reference-free deconvolution of DNA methylation data and mediation by cell composition effects. BMC Bioinforma. 2016;17:259. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1140-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R115. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Levine ME, Lu AT, Quach A, Chen BH, Assimes TL, Bandinelli S, et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY) 2018;10:573–91. doi: 10.18632/aging.101414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Horvath S, Oshima J, Martin GM, Lu AT, Quach A, Cohen H, et al. Epigenetic clock for skin and blood cells applied to Hutchinson Gilford Progeria Syndrome and ex vivo studies. Aging (Albany NY) 2018;10:1758–75. doi: 10.18632/aging.101508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, Zhang L, Hughes G, Sadda S, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell. 2013;49:359–67. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tippmann S. Programming Tools: Adventures with R. Nature. 2015;517:109–10. doi: 10.1038/517109a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Das S, Forer L, Schonherr S, Sidore C, Locke AE, Kwong A, et al. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1284–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.3656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Genomes Project C, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68–74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:904–9. doi: 10.1038/ng1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Willer CJ, Sanna S, Jackson AU, Scuteri A, Bonnycastle LL, Clarke R, et al. Newly identified loci that influence lipid concentrations and risk of coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2008;40:161–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Uhlen M, Oksvold P, Fagerberg L, Lundberg E, Jonasson K, Forsberg M, et al. Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:1248–50. doi: 10.1038/nbt1210-1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Trabzuni D, Ryten M, Walker R, Smith C, Imran S, Ramasamy A, et al. Quality control parameters on a large dataset of regionally dissected human control brains for whole genome expression studies (vol 119, pg 275, 2011) J Neurochemistry. 2012;120:473–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07432.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage. 2012;62:774–81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Destrieux C, Fischl B, Dale A, Halgren E. Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. Neuroimage. 2010;53:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. Ieee T Med Imaging. 1998;17:87–97. doi: 10.1109/42.668698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Segonne F, Dale AM, Busa E, Glessner M, Salat D, Hahn HK, et al. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage. 2004;22:1060–75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Navrady LB, Wolters MK, MacIntyre DJ, Clarke TK, Campbell AI, Murray AD, et al. Cohort Profile: Stratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally (STRADL): a questionnaire follow-up of Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study (GS:SFHS) Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47:13–14g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Smith BH, Campbell A, Linksted P, Fitzpatrick B, Jackson C, Kerr SM, et al. Cohort Profile: Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study (GS:SFHS). The study, its participants and their potential for genetic research on health and illness. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:689–700. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Driscoll I, Hamilton DA, Petropoulos H, Yeo RA, Brooks WM, Baumgartner RN, et al. The aging hippocampus: Cognitive, biochemical and structural findings. Cereb Cortex. 2003;13:1344–51. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhg081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zahr NM, Pohl KM, Saranathan M, Sullivan EV, Pfefferbaum A. Hippocampal subfield CA2+3 exhibits accelerated aging in Alcohol Use Disorder: A preliminary study. Neuroimage-Clin. 2019;22:101764. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rosoff DB, Charlet K, Jung J, Lee J, Muench C, Luo A, et al. Lipid profile dysregulation predicts alcohol withdrawal symptom severity in individuals with alcohol use disorder. Alcohol. 2020;86:93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2020.02.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lee JS, Mukhopadhyay P, Matyas C, Trojnar E, Paloczi J, Yang YR, et al. PCSK9 inhibition as a novel therapeutic target for alcoholic liver disease. Sci Rep. 2019;9:17167. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53603-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bostrand SMK, Vaher K, de Nooij L, Harris MA, Cole JH, Cox SR, et al. Associations between alcohol use and accelerated biological ageing. Addict Biol. 2022;27:e13100. doi: 10.1111/adb.13100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kang JI, Hwang SS, Choi JR, Lee ST, Kim J, Hwang IS, et al. Telomere length in alcohol dependence: A role for impulsive choice and childhood maltreatment. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;83:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yamaki N, Matsushita S, Hara S, Yokoyama A, Hishimoto A, Higuchi S. Telomere shortening in alcohol dependence: Roles of alcohol and acetaldehyde. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;109:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lohoff FW, Clarke TK, Kaminsky ZA, Walker RM, Bermingham ML, Jung J, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of alcohol consumption in N=8161 individuals and relevance to alcohol use disorder pathophysiology: identification of the cystine/glutamate transporter SLC7A11 as a top target. Mol Psychiatr. 2021;27:1754–64. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01378-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tawa EA, Hall SD, Lohoff FW. Overview of the Genetics of Alcohol Use Disorder. Alcohol Alcohol. 2016;51:507–14. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agw046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang D, Zheng MZ, Lei L, Ji J, Yao YL, Qiu YJ, et al. Tespa1 is involved in late thymocyte development through the regulation of TCR-mediated signaling. Nat Immunol. 2012;13:560. doi: 10.1038/ni.2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yang RH, Wang GL, Li LY, He HJ, Zheng MZ, Lu LR, et al. Tespa1 plays a role in the modulation of airway hyperreactivity through the IL-4/STAT6 pathway. J Transl Med. 2020;18:444. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02621-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Arzouni N, Matloff W, Zhao L, Ning K, Toga AW. Identification of Dysregulated Genes for Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Using Gene Expression Data in Brain. J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism. 2020;10:498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Matsuzaki H, Fujimoto T, Tanaka M, Shirasawa S. Tespa1 is a novel component of mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes and affects mitochondrial calcium flux. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2013;433:322–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.02.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Manzo-Avalos S, Saavedra-Molina A. Cellular and mitochondrial effects of alcohol consumption. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7:4281–304. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7124281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Srivastava S. The Mitochondrial Basis of Aging and Age-Related Disorders. Genes-Basel. 2017;8:398. doi: 10.3390/genes8120398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sun N, Youle RJ, Finkel T. The Mitochondrial Basis of Aging. Mol Cell. 2016;61:654–66. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Laurent C, Dorothee G, Hunot S, Martin E, Monnet Y, Duchamp M, et al. Hippocampal T cell infiltration promotes neuroinflammation and cognitive decline in a mouse model of tauopathy. Brain. 2017;140:184–200. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Karch CM, Cruchaga C, Goate AM. Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics: From the Bench to the Clinic. Neuron. 2014;83:11–26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Karch CM, Goate AM. Alzheimer’s disease risk genes and mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Neuner SM, Tcw J, Goate AM. Genetic architecture of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;143:104976. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Anderton BH. Ageing of the brain. Mech Ageing Dev. 2002;123:811–7. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00426-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Fotuhi M, Do D, Jack C. Modifiable factors that alter the size of the hippocampus with ageing. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8:189–202. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Segre AV, Groop L, Mootha VK, Daly MJ, Altshuler D, Consortium D, et al. Common Inherited Variation in Mitochondrial Genes Is Not Enriched for Associations with Type 2 Diabetes or Related Glycemic Traits. Plos Genet. 2010;6:e1001058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lu AT, Hannon E, Levine ME, Crimmins EM, Lunnon K, Mill J, et al. Genetic architecture of epigenetic and neuronal ageing rates in human brain regions. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15353. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Greene CS, Penrod NM, Williams SM, Moore JH. Failure to Replicate a Genetic Association May Provide Important Clues About Genetic Architecture. Plos One. 2009;4:e5639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (139.1KB, docx)

Articles from Molecular Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES