Table 1.

A comparison of glucose sensing performance of MG–Cu₂O with others glucose sensors.

Electrode	Sensing method	Linear range (mM)	Detection limit (µM)	Sensitivity (µAmM−1 cm−2)	Ref
Cu2O/Au/GO	NE	Upto 16.65	0.83	2886	34
CuO/CG-GCE	NE	0.1–3.17	0.01	1295	66
Cu NP on laser induced graphene	NE	0.001–6	0.39	495	67
Ni/rGO/PU	NE	0.01–2	1.28	4876	68
Cu-Co/rGO/PGE	NE	0.001–4	0.15	240	69
S doped rGO/CuS	NE	20.1	0.032	429	65
Pt-CuO-Pt	NE	2.2–10	1.42	2921	18
Cu/rGO	NE	0.1–12.5	65	172	70
GOx/Au/MX/Nafion	E	0.1–18	5.9	4.2	43
NiO/Graphene	NE	0.005–4.2	0.1	666.7	33
MXene/NiCo-LDH	NE	0.002–4.096	0.53	64.75	71
MXene-Cu2O	NE	0.01–30	2.83	11.064	44
Cu2O/rGO/MXene (MG-Cu2O)	NE	0.01–30	2.1	125.6	This work

*GCE glassy carbon electrode, CG carboxylate graphene, PU polyurethane, PCE pencil graphite electrode, LDH layered double hydroxide, NE non enzymatic, E enzymatic.