Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 2;26(12):7219–7228. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04682-9

Table 2.

ICP-MS analysis of tested materials

Sample name 27 Al [He] 29 Si [He] 34 S [He] 42 Ca [He] 88 Sr [He] 91 Zr [He] 137 Ba [He]
Conc. [ppb] Conc. [ppm] Conc. [ppm] Conc. [ppm] Conc. [ppb] Conc. [ppm] Conc. [ppb]
NeoPutty 47.58 ± 0.04AB 4.17 ± 0.00 0.93 ± 0.02AB 10.55 ± 0.00B 28.40 ± 0.01AB 0.27 ± 0.04AB 0.72 ± 0.00AB
NeoMTA Plus 115.72 ± 0.02AC 6.75 ± 0.02 7.80 ± 0.02AB 9.04 ± 0.02C 425.40 ± 0.02AC 0.15 ± 0.03A 5.23 ± 0.00AC
MTA Angelus  < 0.000 ± 0.00AC 5.84 ± 0.00  < 0.000 ± 0.00AC 79.10 ± 0.03BC 1815.25 ± 0.02BC 0.14 ± 0.00B 2.39 ± 0.00BC

Uppercase A (A) indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between NeoPutty and NeoMTA Plus. Uppercase B (B) indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between NeoPutty and MTA Angelus. Uppercase C (C) indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between NeoMTA Plus and MTA Angelus. ppm, parts per million; ppb parts per billion