Table 3.

Log₁₀ OHP model chosen by variable selection, with random effects (n = 894)^§.

Fixed effects		Random Effects		Explained variability a
Variables	% change in OHP (95% CI)	Person	Residuals	$R_m^2$	$R_c^2$
Intercept	−0.46*** (−0.58, −0.33)	0.06	0.31	0.15	0.28
For each 10% increase in pyrimethanil concentration (ng/m3)	5.72*** (4.64, 6.82)b
For each 10% increase in distance to banana plantation (meters)	−0.72** (−1.17, −0.27)b
For eating rice and beans 15 times a week or more	−23.0* (−38.2, −4.03)c

^a${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{m}}^2$ represents variability explained by the fixed effects; ${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{c}}^2$ represents variability explained by both fixed and random effects.

^bThe β estimates for pyrimethanil and distance to plantation reflect % increase in OHP per 10% increase in pyrimethanil concentration and distance to plantation, respectively.

^cThe β estimate for eating rice and beans reflects % increase in OHP expected for women who eat rice and beans 15 + times a week compared to those that do not.

^***denotes significance at the 0.001 level

^**the 0.01 level

^*the 0.05 level.

^§The unadjusted estimates (95% CI) from the regression for the intercept = −0.65 (−0.71, −0.59), and for each 10% increase in pyrimethanil concentration = 5.83 (4.84, 6.84).