Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2022 May 30;35(4):1684–1700. doi: 10.1017/S0954579422000384

Table 3.

Model comparisons for measurement invariance testing by sex for the multigroup models in each country

Model Description LL Npar SC Comparison df LRTS  p value
DRC
1.0 Fully unconstrained −9687.62 87 1.10
1.1 Item-response probabilities constrained −9751.44 47 1.12 1.1 vs. 1.0 40 119.37 <0.001
2.1 Self-blame (1) constrained −9695.10 83 1.11 2.1 vs. 1.0 4 18.84 0.001
2.2 Worry (2) constrained −9692.35 83 1.11 2.2 vs. 1.0 4 11.36 0.023
2.3 Can’t sleep (3) constrained −9693.01 83 1.07 2.3 vs. 1.0 4 6.20 0.185
2.4 Feel sad (4) constrained −9692.26 83 1.11 2.4 vs. 1.0 4 10.40 0.034
2.5 Think of self-harm (5) constrained −9689.02 83 1.10 2.5 vs. 1.0 4 2.73 0.605
2.6 Bullied/threatened (6) constrained −9690.00 83 1.12 2.6 vs. 1.0 4 8.55 0.073
2.7 Slapped/hit/hurt (7) constrained −9690.39 83 1.11 2.7 vs. 1.0 4 7.06 0.132
2.8 Been teased/called names (8) constrained −9698.87 83 1.15 2.8 vs. 1.0 4 214.67 <0.001
2.9 Been slapped/hit/hurt (9) constrained −9703.14 83 1.10 2.9 vs. 1.0 4 28.36 <0.001
2.10 Substance use (10) constrained −9691.51 83 1.11 2.10 vs. 1.0 4 9.20 0.056
3.1 Indicators 3 and 5 constrained −9693.23 79 1.07 3.1 vs. 1.0 8 0.442 7.91
3.2 Indicators 3, 5, and 6 constrained −9695.95 75 1.09 3.2 vs. 1.0 12 14.55 0.267
3.3 Indicators 3, 5, 6, and 7 constrained −9698.19 71 1.08 3.3 vs. 1.0 16 17.88 0.331
3.4 Indicators 3, 5, 6, 7, and 10 constrained 9700.95 67 1.09 3.4 vs. 1.0 20 23.89 0.247
4.1 Class prevalences constrained −9713.69 64 1.14 5.1 vs. 3.4 3 148.13 <0.001
Malawi
1.0 Fully unconstrained −12,031.75 87 1.17
1.1 Item-response probabilities constrained −12,076.94 47 1.42 1.1 vs. 1.0 40 102.36 <0.001
2.1 Self-blame (1) constrained −12,036.33 83 1.21 2.1 vs. 1.0 4 22.90 <0.001
2.2 Worry (2) constrained −12,035.79 83 1.22 2.2 vs. 1.0 4 50.67 <0.001
2.3 Can’t sleep (3) constrained −12,034.79 83 1.23 2.3 vs. 1.0 4 331.57 <0.001
2.4 Feel sad (4) constrained −12,033.10 83 1.17 2.4 vs. 1.0 4 2.16 0.706
2.5 Think of self-harm (5) constrained −12,032.67 83 1.16 2.5 vs. 1.0 4 1.20 0.879
2.6 Bullied/threatened (6) constrained −12,040.52 83 1.28 2.6 vs. 1.0 4 −16.79
2.7 Slapped/hit/hurt (7) constrained −12,035.80 83 1.24 2.7 vs. 1.0 4 −56.41
2.8 Been teased/called names (8) constrained −12,038.80 83 1.32 2.8 vs. 1.0 4 −7.57
2.9 Been slapped/hit/hurt (9) constrained −12,037.17 83 1.29 2.9 vs. 1.0 4 −8.72
2.10 Substance use (10) constrained −12,051.49 83 1.41 2.10 vs. 1.0 4 −10.59
3.1 Indicators 4 and 5 constrained −12,033.83 79 1.17 3.1 vs. 1.0 8 3.29 0.915
3.2 Indicators 3, 4, and 5 constrained −12,038.33 75 1.22 3.2 vs. 1.0 12 15.06 0.238
3.3 Indicators 2, 3, 4, and 5 constrained −12,042.70 71 1.21 3.3 vs. 1.0 16 21.22 0.170
3.4 Indicators 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 constrained 12,047.10 67 1.20 3.4 vs. 1.0 20 28.28 0.103
4.1 Class prevalences constrained −12,052.26 64 1.26 5.1 vs. 3.4 3 −89.10
Indonesia
1.0 Fully unconstrained −23,636.94 87 1.60
1.1 Item-response probabilities constrained −23,871.07 47 1.93 1.1 vs. 1.0 40 386.82 <0.001
2.1 Self-blame (1) constrained −23,640.23 83 1.61 2.1 vs. 1.0 4 4.71 0.318
2.2 Worry (2) constrained −23,639.40 83 1.61 2.2 vs. 1.0 4 3.46 0.485
2.3 Can’t sleep (3) constrained −23,653.48 83 1.65 2.3 vs. 1.0 4 62.36 <0.001
2.4 Feel sad (4) constrained −23,640.24 83 1.62 2.4 vs. 1.0 4 5.88 0.209
2.5 Think of self-harm (5) constrained −23,653.61 83 1.63 2.5 vs. 1.0 4 33.93 <0.001
2.6 Bullied/threatened (6) constrained −23,647.95 83 1.60 2.6 vs. 1.0 4 14.43 0.006
2.7 Slapped/hit/hurt (7) constrained −23,639.87 83 1.58 2.7 vs. 1.0 4 2.93 0.570
2.8 Been teased/called names (8) constrained −23,642.67 83 1.61 2.8 vs. 1.0 4 8.32 0.080
2.9 Been slapped/hit/hurt (9) constrained −23,658.37 83 1.62 2.9 vs. 1.0 4 36.72 <0.001
2.10 Substance use (10) constrained −23,784.29 83 1.72 2.10 vs. 1.0 4 −346.95
3.1 Indicators 1 and 2 constrained −23,644.50 79 1.62 3.1 vs. 1.0 8 11.14 0.194
3.2 Indicators 1, 2, and 4 constrained −23,648.42 75 1.65 3.2 vs. 1.0 12 17.99 0.116
3.3 Indicators 1, 2, 4, and 7 constrained −23,650.98 71 1.61 3.3 vs. 1.0 16 18.18 0.314
3.4 Items 1, 2, 4, 7, and 8 constrained 23,659.91 67 1.64 3.4 vs. 1.0 20 31.15 0.053
4.1 Class prevalences constrained −23,710.47 64 1.65 5.1 vs. 3.4 3 73.95 <0.001
China
1.0 Fully unconstrained −8783.53 65 1.22
1.1 Item-response probabilities constrained −8826.64 35 1.33 1.1 vs. 1.0 30 78.86 <0.001
2.1 Self-blame (1) constrained −8784.12 62 1.24 2.1 vs. 1.0 3 1.59 0.661
2.2 Worry (2) constrained −8787.22 62 1.28 2.2 vs. 1.0 3 −105.30
2.3 Can’t sleep (3) constrained −8784.22 62 1.26 2.3 vs. 1.0 3 3.24 0.356
2.4 Feel sad (4) constrained −8785.16 62 1.26 2.4 vs. 1.0 3 9.48 0.024
2.5 Think of self-harm (5) constrained −8791.79 62 1.29 2.5 vs. 1.0 3 −86.04
2.6 Bullied/threatened (6) constrained −8784.19 62 1.25 2.6 vs. 1.0 3 1.98 0.576
2.7 Slapped/hit/hurt (7) constrained −8788.86 62 1.13 2.7 vs. 1.0 3 3.49 0.322
2.8 Been teased/called names (8) constrained −8790.78 62 1.24 2.8 vs. 1.0 3 16.74 0.001
2.9 Been slapped/hit/hurt (9) constrained −8798.40 62 1.26 2.9 vs. 1.0 3 80.39 <0.001
2.10 Substance use (10) constrained −8784.00 62 1.17 2.10 vs. 1.0 3 0.43 0.934
3.1 Indicators 1 and 3 constrained −8784.77 59 1.30 3.1 vs. 1.0 6 5.28 0.509
3.2 Indicators 1, 3, and 6 constrained −8785.56 56 1.32 3.2 vs. 1.0 9 6.56 0.683
3.3 Indicators 1, 3, 6, and 7 constrained −8792.75 53 1.21 3.3 vs. 1.0 12 14.75 0.255
3.4 Indicators 1, 3, 6, 7, and 10 constrained −8793.17 50 1.15 3.4 vs. 1.0 15 13.44 0.569
3.5 Indicators 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 10 constrained −8794.72 47 1.20 3.5 vs. 1.0 18 17.54 0.486
3.6 Indicators 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 10 constrained 8798.51 44 1.25 3.6 vs. 1.0 21 25.72 0.217
4.1 Class prevalences constrained −8818.20 42 1.13 4.1 vs. 3.6 2 10.46 0.005

Note. LL = log likelihood; Npar = number of parameters; SC = scaling correction factor; LRTS = likelihood ratio test statistic. Bold indicates best-fitting model as suggested by the LRTS. No p values reported for model comparisons with a negative LRTS.