Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 14;107(5):1041–1046. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0413

Table 3.

Regression analysis for graft failure (N = 383)

Hazard ratio* 95% CI P value
Age (mean = 48.6, SD = 13.0) 1.02 0.99–1.04 0.172
Male sex (N = 223) 1.89 0.96–3.72 0.066
Diabetes (N = 117) 1.90 1.01–3.55 0.046
Country of birth 0.108
 Foreign-born (N = 75) Ref Ref
 U.S.-born (N = 150) 2.73 0.61–12.3 0.191
 Unidentified (N = 158) 4.16 0.98–17.7 0.053
Rejection (biopsy-confirmed) (N = 18) 2.62 1.14–5.99 0.023
 Immune risk 0.143
 High (N = 191) Ref Ref
 Standard (N = 157) 1.38 0.42–4.58 0.598
 Low (N = 35) 0.63 0.17–2.34 0.494
Maintenance immunosuppression decreased (N = 12) 0.46 0.06–3.37 0.446
Positive parasite screen (N = 10) 12.52 0.78–201 0.074
Positive tuberculosis screen (N = 17) 0 N/A 0.998
Living with HIV§ (N = 4) 0 N/A 0.997
High risk EBV (donor+/recipient–) (N = 18) 0 N/A 0.997
High risk CMV (donor+/recipient–) (N = 62) 1.75 0.85–3.57 0.127
High risk toxoplasmosis (donor+/recipient–)ǁ (N = 6) 6.58 0.84–51.70 0.073

CI = confidence interval; CMV = cytomegalovirus; EBV = Epstein–Barr virus; N/A = not applicable; Ref = reference.

Bold indicates a significant P value.

*

There were no events of graft failure among transplant recipients with positive tuberculosis screening, living with HIV, or at high risk for EBV, and thus a hazard ratio could not be calculated for these variables.

Includes 100 transplant recipients with strongyloidiasis (N = 95) and/or schistosomiasis (N = 47) screening results. Due to the small number of graft failure events among these transplant recipients, individual hazard ratios for strongyloidiasis and schistosomiasis screening could not be calculated.

Includes 216 transplant recipients with interferon gamma release assay tuberculosis screening results.

§

Includes 378 transplant recipients with known HIV status.

ǁ

Includes 304 transplant recipients with known toxoplasmosis status.