Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 17;107(5):1047–1054. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0276

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of the Schistoscope 5.0 for the detection of Schistosoma eggs performed on 487 urines collected at baseline screening

Conventional microscopy Schistoscope 5.0
Semiautomated digital microscopy Automated digital microscopy
Sen (95% CI) Spec (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPP (95% CI) Sen (95% CI) Spec (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI)
All samples with S. haematobium infection (N = 166) 80.1 (73.2–86.0) 95.3 (92.4–97.4) 89.8 (84.0–94.2) 90.3 (87.0–93.2) 87.3 (81.3–92.0) 48.9 (43.3–55.0) 46.9 (41.2–53.0) 88.2 (83.0–93.0)
Low-intensity infection* (n = 129) 75.2 (67.0–82.3) 83.7 (76.1-90.0)
High-intensity infection† (n = 37) 97.3 (86.0–100.0) 100

CI = confidence interval; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; Sen = sensitivity; Spec = specificity.

*

≤ 50 eggs/10 mL urine.

> 50 eggs/10 mL urine.