Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 16;12:1041839. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1041839

Table 3.

Comparison of original manual plans and mCycle plans in terms of plan complexity and plan delivery. Median values and ranges are reported.

PLAN COMPLEXITY MP mCP Wilcoxon or t test Levene’s or Bartlett’s test
MCS(1) 0.29 [0.24–0.34] 0.26 [0.23–0.30] <0.001/0.002 0.047
MU (2) 751.2 [644.1–875.2] 783.5 [721.2–985.1] 0.086/1.000 0.188
Segments (2) 211 [134–257] 148 [133–196] 0.001/0.027 <0.001
PLAN DELIVERY ACCURACY MP mCP Wilcoxon or t test Levene’s or Bartlett’s test
PR (3%/3 mm) (%) (1) 97.0 [92.7–99.2] 97.1 [95.0–98.6] 0.441/1.000 0.018
PR (2%/2 mm) (%) (1) 89.2 [79.2–96.7] 90.3 [84.3–96.1] 0.331/1.000 0.031
ɣmean (2) 0.33 [0.24–0.45] 0.32 [0.22–0.39] 0.498/1.000 0.055
ɣmax (2) 2.01 [1.67–3.44] 2.62 [1.58–3.92] 0.079/1.000 0.190
ɣCI (1) 0.75 [0.57–0.98] 0.75 [0.55–0.97] 0.911/1.000 0.274

MP, manual plans; mCP, mCycle plans; MCS, modulation complexity score; MU, monitor units; PR, gamma passing ratio; ɣmean, mean gamma index value; ɣmax, maximum gamma index value; ɣCI, gamma confidence interval; (1), Gaussian distribution; (2), not normal distribution. In Wilcoxon and t test column, non-corrected and Bonferroni-corrected p-values are reported (p-value/corrected p-value). Bold: Statistical significance (p <0.05).