Table 3.

Summary of statistical analyses of ERP amplitudes.

	N1			N2			P2			P3			LPP
	F	p	${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$	F	p	${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$	F	p	${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$	F	p	${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$	F	p	${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$
Group	1.33	0.254	0.02	0.13	0.723	< 0.01	1.25	0.268	0.02	0.24	0.624	< 0.01	0.20	0.660	< 0.01
Stimuli type	2.48	0.121	0.04	0.41	0.527	0.01	5.13	0.027	0.08	0.57	0.452	0.01	1.10	0.299	0.02
Pain	5.38	0.024	0.09	38.70	< 0.001	0.40	11.61	0.001	0.17	34.44	< 0.001	0.37	46.49	< 0.001	0.45
Group × Stimuli type	7.41	0.009	0.11	0.40	0.532	0.01	0.60	0.443	0.01	0.55	0.460	0.01	0.67	0.415	0.01
Group × Pain	0.34	0.564	0.01	3.09	0.084	0.05	2.92	0.093	0.05	0.02	0.899	< 0.01	0.71	0.404	0.01
Stimuli type × Pain	1.97	0.166	0.03	< 0.01	0.971	< 0.01	1.06	0.307	0.02	< 0.01	0.986	< 0.01	1.53	0.222	0.03
Group × Stimuli type × Pain	0.67	0.416	0.01	0.01	0.934	< 0.01	12.19	0.001	0.17	1.59	0.212	0.03	0.40	0.532	0.01

Notes: Results were obtained using repeated-measures ANOVA with the within-participant factors of “Stimuli type” (dynamic stimuli, static stimuli) and “Pain” (painful, non-painful), as well as the between-participants factor of “Group” (High-AQ, Low-AQ).

Significant comparisons (p < 0.05) are indicated in boldface.