Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 16;10:921494. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.921494

Table 3.

Comparison of the adjusted prevalence rates of face mask-wearing among quintiles of the socioeconomic factors, using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA).

Quintiles Adjusted prevalence rates (CI 95%) of mask usage *
Land price Employment Literacy
Q1 28.6 (27.7–29.5) 39.8 (38.8–40.7) 12.4 (10.9–14.0)
Q2 46.4 (45.4–47.3) 39.0 (38.3–39.8) 27.2 (26.8–27.6)
Q3 40.1 (39.3–40.8) 42.5 (41.7–43.4) 51.5 (50.8–52.1)
Q4 45.1 (44.3–45.8) 40.3 (39.5–41.1) 52.0 (51.4–52.5)
Q5 56.0 (55.4–56.5) 59.1 (58.4–59.7) 63.6 (63.1–64.0)
P-value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
*

The adjusted prevalence rates are calculated using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA), adjusted for age and gender.