Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;38(1-2):NP1007–NP1039. doi: 10.1177/08862605221086642

Table 3.

Logistic Regression of High Prevalence of IPV on Risk Context and Income Group.

Model 1: Risk Context Model 2: Income Group Model 3: Risk Context and Income Group
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Risk context
1: Non-patriarchal egalitarian with low rates of homicide ref. <0.001 ref. 0.270
2: Patriarchal post-colonial with high rates of homicide 50.6 (13.2, 194.1) 6.0 (0.7, 53.1)
3: Patriarchal post-colonial conflict and disaster-affected 45.2 (12.2, 167.0) 5.1 (0.6, 45.8)
Income group
High ref. <0.001 ref. 0.001
Upper middle 9.2 (1.3, 66.1) 3.3 (0.2, 45.6)
Lower middle 48.4 (6.1, 384.8) 13.3 (0.7, 266.5)
Low 144.2 (18.4, 1132.0) 39.6 (1.8, 852.1)

N = 3,175 country-years. Adjusted for clustering within countries and time-based variation and weighted by the posterior probabilities of latent class membership. High prevalence of IPV: fifth quintile of physical and/or sexual IPV prevalence, OR: odds ratio of having a high prevalence of IPV. CI: Confidence Interval. p-values for Wald tests for overall effects of variables.