Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 20;9:927970. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.927970

Table 2.

Head-to-head comparisons of efficacy of FMT.

A 0.83(0.15,4.64) 0.51(0.05,5.09) 0.17 (0.01,3.51) 0.11(0.02,0.5) 0.14(0.01,2.64) 0.20 (0.01,3.15)
1.21 (0.22,6.77) B 0.62 (0.11,3.38) 0.20 (0.01,6.67) 0.13(0.03,0.72) 0.17 (0.01,2.53) 0.24 (0.02,2.97)
1.95 (0.20,19.44) 1.62 (0.30,8.85) C 0.33 (0.01,14.79) 0.22 (0.02,2.19) 0.28 (0.01,6.49)  0.38 (0.02,7.83)
6.00 (0.28,126.34) 4.97(0.15,164.69) 3.07 (0.07,139.57) D 0.67(0.02,20.74) 0.86(0.01,58.13) 1.18 (0.02,72.65)
8.98 (1.84,43.92) 7.44(1.39,39.75) 4.60 (0.46,46.37) 1.50 (0.05,46.49) E 1.28(0.09,18.32) 1.77(0.14,21.87)
7.01 (0.38,129.38) 5.80(0.40,85.13) 3.59 (0.15,83.50) 1.17 (0.02,79.25) 0.78(0.05,11.14) F 1.38 (0.04,44.62)
5.08 (0.32,81.14) 4.21(0.34,52.48) 2.60 (0.13,52.91) 0.85 (0.01,52.04) 0.57 (0.05,6.99) 0.72(0.02,23.45) G

(A) fresh fecal bacteria; (B) frozen fecal bacteria; (C) lyophilized fecal bacteria; (D) autologous fecal bacteria; (E) vancomycin; (F) fidaxomicin; (G) rectal bacteriotherapy.