Skip to main content
. 2020 Fall;15(4):198–210. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i4.23778

Table 4.

Certainty of evidence of dichotomous data

Participants (RCTs) Indirectness Imprecision Overall certainty Study event rates (%) Relative effect (95% CI) Anticipated absolute effects
Rotary Reciprocanting Risk with Rotary Risk difference (Reciprocanting)
123 (2) 12 h
very serious a,b very serious c,d Very low 35/61 (57.4%) 36/62
(58.1%)
1.01
(0.75 to 1.37)
574 per 1.000 6 more per 1.000 (from 143 fewer to 212 more)
1411 (4) 24 h
serious b not serious Moderate 584/705 (82.8%) 603/706
(85.4%)
1.03
(0.99 to 1.08)
828 per 1.000 25 more per 1.000 (from 8 fewer to 66 more)
1270 (2) 48 h
serious b not serious Moderate 590/635 (92.9%) 611/635
(96.2%)
1.04
(1.01 to 1.06)
929 per 1.000 37 more per 1.000 (from 9 more to 56 more)
1456 (5) 72 h
serious b not serious Moderate 684/720 (95.0%) 683/736
(92.8%)
1.00
(0.99 to 1.01)
950 per 1.000 10 fewer per 1.000 (from 76 fewer to 76 more)
1288 (2) 7 days
serious b not serious Moderate 638/644 (99.1%) 643/644
(99.8%)
1.01
(1.00 to 1.01)
991 per 1.000 10 more per 1.000 (from 0 fewer to 10 more)

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; a: Meta-analysis included only one pulp condition; b: Meta-analysis included studies that performed only one visit; c: Total number of events is less than 300; d: Upper or lower confidence limit crosses the effect size is greater than 25% of estimated effect in either direction