Skip to main content
. 2020 Fall;15(4):198–210. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i4.23778

Table 5.

Certainty of evidence for continuous data

Participants (RCTs ) Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Overall certainty Study event rates (%) Anticipated absolute effects a
Rotary Reciprocating
142 (2) 6 h
serious a serious b serious c very serious d,e strong association Very low 71 71 SMD 0.26 SD higher (0.5 lower to 1.03 higher)
390 (3) 12 h
not serious serious b not serious serious d strong association Moderate 195 195 SMD 0.32 SD higher (0.14 lower to 0.78 higher)
782 (10) 24 h
serious f not serious not serious not serious strong association High 402 380 SMD 0.25 higher (0.06 higher to 0.44 higher)
599 (4) 48 h
not serious serious b not serious not serious strong association High 311 288 SMD 0.31 SD higher (0.04 lower to 0.66 higher)
519 (6) 72 h
not serious very serious b,g very serious h,i serious e none Very low 271 248 SMD 0.5 higher (0.24 lower to 1.24 higher)

SMD: Standardized mean difference; a: All included studies presented high risk of bias; b: Substantial or considerable heterogeneity; c: Meta-analysis included only one pulp condition; d: Total number of participants is less than 400; e: Upper or lower confidence limit crosses the effect size is greater than 0.5 in either direction