Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara vaccines and implication for pandemic influenza vaccine development.
Advantage | Implication for influenza vaccine production | Disadvantage | Implication for influenza vaccine production |
---|---|---|---|
Production
| |||
Independent of embryonated chicken eggs, in (stockpiled) CEF cells |
Flexible vaccine production |
Use of primary/secondary CEF cells |
Higher risk for adventitious agent contamination |
Safe, BSL-1 conditions |
Ease of manufacturing |
|
|
Option to upscale |
Increase production capacity |
|
|
Efficacy
| |||
Induction of strong antibody responses |
Use of adjuvant is not required |
High dose required |
Increased costs |
Induction of cross-reactive antibodies |
Protection against antigenically distinct variants |
|
|
Induction of T-cell responses |
Possibility for broadly protective immunity |
|
|
No interference by pre-existing vector immunity |
Allows for repeated vaccination and induction of antibodies to multiple influenza virus antigens |
|
|
Safety
| |||
Replication deficiency and avirulence |
Acceptable safety profile |
|
|
Administration to immunocompromized individuals |
Vaccination of these high-risk patients possible |
|
|
Multivalent vaccines possible |
Induction of virus-specific antibodies and T cell Expression of multiple HA genes to induce broad protective antibody responses |
|
|
Stability
| |||
Record for stability as lyophilized vaccine >4 weeks at 37°C* | Stockpiling of vaccines possible |
*Taken from [61].
CEF: Chicken embryo fibroblast; HA: Hemagglutinin.