Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 30;113(6):597–603. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esac045

Table 4.

Family richness and family-level phylogenetic distinctness of phyla in California and the CCGP.

Phylum No. families in CA No. families in all-CA tree All-CA: total ES All-CA: group % of total ES CCGP: total ES CCGP: group % of total ES Group % missing out of total missing
Kingdom Animalia
 Arthropoda 446 281 57,389.96 39.1% 4,038.33 31.0% 39.9%
 Chordata 238 216 21,694.03 14.8% 4,003.52 30.7% 13.2%
 Mollusca 248 65 18,241.78 12.4% 1,324.53 10.2% 12.7%
 Echinodermata 25 17 4,713.07 3.2% 495.61 3.8% 3.2%
 Cnidaria 24 8 4,199.38 2.9% 545.69 4.2% 2.7%
 Annelida 16 5 2,662.37 1.8% 0.0% 2.0%
 Sipuncula 1 1 665.50 0.5% 0.0% 0.5%
 Brachiopoda 5 1 583.82 0.4% 0.0% 0.4%
 Phoronida 1 1 583.82 0.4% 0.0% 0.4%
 Bryozoa 8 0
 Ctenophora 1 0
 Nemertea 3 0
 Platyhelminthes 6 0
 Porifera 8 0
Kingdom Plantae
 Tracheophyta 190 188 19,861.00 13.5% 2,428.40 18.6% 13.0%
 Rhodophyta 28 13 5,363.44 3.7% 0.0% 4.0%
 Marchantiophyta 19 18 4,065.50 2.8% 213.01 1.6% 2.9%
 Chlorophyta 7 0 3,535.23 2.4% 0.0% 2.6%
 Bryophyta 28 14 2,315.75 1.6% 0.0% 1.7%
 Anthocerotophyta 2 2 780.04 0.5% 0.0% 0.6%
 Charophyta 1 5

The family richness of all plant and animal species in California (“No. families in CA”) is greater than that of the all-CA tree (“No. families in all-CA tree”) because some families identified in the GBIF occurrence data did not have molecular time estimates available in TimeTree. The “group % missing out of total missing” is the percentage of that group’s ES that is not covered by CCGP taxa out of the non-CCGP ES totaled across all groups.