Table 5.
Variable | N | % | Product scores | SUS scores | uMARS scores | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
± s | t/F,P | ± s | t/F,P | ± s | t/F,P | |||
Information Sources | ||||||||
Online media | 8 | 17.2 | 4.04 ± 0.55 | F = 3.007 | 80.00 ± 14.90 | F = 9.383 | 21.40 ± 2.88 | F = 4.113 |
Medical staff | 20 | 43.5 | 4.40 ± 0.68 | P = 0.041 | 85.25 ± 6.73 | P < 0.001 | 23.30 ± 3.32 | P = 0.012 |
Friends | 18 | 39.1 | 3.61 ± 1.13 | 82.50 ± 13.96 | 18.83 ± 4.79 | |||
Recommend intention | ||||||||
Highly | 38 | 82.6 | 4.34 ± 0.67 | t = −6.559 | 84.21 ± 9.08 | t = −1.126 | 22.13 ± 3.21 | t = −3.325 |
General | 8 | 17.4 | 2.63 ± 0.69 | P < 0.001 | 79.38 ± 18.16 | P = 0.266 | 17.13 ± 6.31 | P = 0.002 |
Product quality | ||||||||
Good | 39 | 84.8 | 4.18 ± 0.78 | F = 3.007 | 85.19 ± 8.69 | F = 0.703 | 21.95 ± 3.42 | F = 5.649 |
Average | 7 | 15.2 | 3.33 ± 1.51 | P = 0.060 | 74.17 ± 18.75 | P = 0.501 | 16.33 ± 6.47 | P = 0.007 |
Cost performance | ||||||||
High | 29 | 63.0 | 4.22 ± 0.82 | t = −1.749 | 83.53 ± 9.58 | t = −0.131 | 23.28 ± 2.52 | t = −5.262 |
Low | 17 | 37.0 | 3.74 ± 1.06 | P = 0.087 | 83.09 ± 13.56 | P = 0.897 | 17.82 ± 4.53 | P < 0.001 |
Product price (RMB) | ||||||||
0–1000 | 34 | 73.9 | 3.91 ± 0.95 | t = 1.636 | 75.36 ± 10.76 | t = 1.954 | 20.29 ± 4.46 | t = 2.761 |
≥ 1000 | 12 | 26.1 | 4.42 ± 0.79 | P = 0.109 | 81.87 ± 6.75 | P = 0.057 | 24.00 ± 2.00 | P < 0.001 |
Product functions | ||||||||
Monitoring | 32 | 69.6 | 3.94 ± 1.01 | F = 0.607 | 75.55 ± 11.34 | F = 0.794 | 20.41 ± 4.51 | F = 2.358 |
Behavior management | 4 | 8.7 | 4.00 ± 0.816 | P = 0.614 | 79.17 ± 11.81 | P = 0.254 | 21.75 ± 4.92 | P = 0.085 |
Synthesis | 10 | 21.7 | 4.40 ± 0.69 | 80.75 ± 4.57 | 23.80 ± 1.93 |
± s: Mean ± standard deviation, SUS System usability scale, uMARS User version of the mobile application rating scale