Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 31;14(10):e30910. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30910

Table 2. Quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) check tool for observational studies.

N/A: non-applicable.

Study/Year of publication  Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Were confounding factors identified? Were the strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?  Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the time of exposure)?  Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?  Was the follow-up time reported sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? Was the follow-up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow-up described and explored? Were strategies to address incomplete follow-up utilized? Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
Lindsay et al.  2009 [15]    N/A  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  N/A  Yes  Yes 
Bafna et al.  2021 [16]    N/A  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 
Kim et al.  2015 [17 Yes  Yes  Yes  N/A  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  N/A  Yes 
Park et al.  2010 [18]    Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  N/A  Yes 
Barbero-Villares et al. 2011 [19]       N/A  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  N/A  N/A  Yes  Yes 
Lahdenne et al. 2002 [20 Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  No  Yes 
Laharie et al. 2006 [21 N/A  N/A  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 
Laharie et al.  2010 [22 Yes  Yes  N/A Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes