Skip to main content
. 2021 May 24;116:103274. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103274

Table 5.

Regression results on the effectiveness of neighborhood collaboration across six cities in China.

Model 1
Model 2
Model 3 (weighted)
Model 4
B S.E. B S.E. B S.E. B S.E.
Neighborhood social trust 0.046 0.079 0.051 0.079 0.096 0.096 0.149 0.131
Neighborhood civic engagement 0.169 0.075 0.131 0.098 0.079 0.095 0.250 0.164
Lack of community participation −0.271⁎⁎ 0.096 −0.280 0.101 −0.266 0.118 −0.353 0.159
Perceived priority 0.477⁎⁎⁎ 0.032 0.449⁎⁎⁎ 0.075 0.470⁎⁎⁎ 0.065 0.851⁎⁎⁎ 0.124
Perceived pressure −0.136 0.083 −0.128 0.089 −0.143 0.088 −0.219 0.157
Lack of incentives −0.054 0.085 −0.035 0.086 −0.090 0.087 −0.168 0.16
Perceived government support 0.147⁎⁎ 0.044 0.168⁎⁎ 0.046 0.190⁎⁎⁎ 0.053 0.307⁎⁎ 0.106
COVID case 0.159+ 0.082 0.146+ 0.081 0.332 0.166
Perceived uncertainty −0.123 0.078 −0.144 0.098 −0.101 0.200
Perceived difficulty 0.082 0.032 0.088⁎⁎ 0.026 0.172⁎⁎⁎ 0.054
Age 0.015⁎⁎ 0.004 0.016⁎⁎⁎ 0.004 0.033⁎⁎⁎ 0.009
Female 0.000 0.055 −0.020 0.077 −0.095 0.104
Leader −0.056 0.123 −0.043 0.105 −0.179 0.225
Inner-city location −0.042 0.090 −0.078 0.080 −0.084 0.177
Megacity −0.370⁎⁎⁎ 0.087 −0.359⁎⁎⁎ 0.090 −0.739⁎⁎⁎ 0.174
Constant 3.111⁎⁎⁎ 0.348 2.418⁎⁎ 0.690 2.131⁎⁎⁎ 0.594 0.149 0.131
N 820 820 820 820
R2 0.338 0.379 0.402 /
Log likelihood / / / −954.946

Note: Models 1–3 report results from multiple linear regression and model 4 report results from ordinal logistic regression, with standard errors clustered by sub-district in all models.

⁎⁎⁎

p < 0.001.

⁎⁎

p < 0.01.

p < 0.05.

+

p < 0.1.