Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 22;244:98–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.08.013

Table 9.

Baseline MP-OCT overlay metrics, overall and by clinical diagnosis and disease duration.

All Clinical Diagnosis P-value Disease durationb P-value
N USH2 ARRP <10 10–20 ≥20
N= 83 N=51 N=32 N= 29 N=34 N=19
Average sensitivity within Intact EZ Area 0.17 0.08
 Median (Q1, Q3) 23 (21, 25) 22 (21, 25) 24 (22, 25) 22 (21, 25) 24 (22, 25) 20 (18, 24)
Average sensitivity (interpolated) within intact EZ area 0.13 0.02
 Median (Q1, Q3) 21 (19, 24) 21 (18, 23) 22 (20, 24) 21 (19, 24) 21 (20, 23) 18 (15, 23)
Average sensitivity outside intact EZ area 0.80 0.02
 Median (Q1, Q3) 2 (1, 6) 2 (1, 7) 2 (2, 5) 4 (2, 8) 2 (1, 4) 3 (1, 5)
Average sensitivity (interpolated) outside intact EZ Area 0.64 0.01
 Median (Q1, Q3) 2 (1, 5) 2 (1, 5) 2 (1, 4) 3 (2, 6) 1 (1, 3) 2 (0, 4)
Number of pixels within intact EZ area within the interpolated microperimetry map a 0.03 <0.001
 Median (Q1, Q3) 21 (10, 43) 16 (6, 36) 24 (14, 60) 37 (23, 62) 16 (10, 34) 7 (3, 16)
Number of pixels outside intact EZ area within the interpolated microperimetry map a 0.04 <0.001
 Median (Q1, Q3) 713 (691, 724) 718 (699, 728) 710 (675, 720) 696 (673, 711) 718 (701, 725) 728 (715, 731)
Number of sensitivity points within intact EZ area 0.03 <0.001
 Median (Q1, Q3) 5 (3, 9) 4 (2, 8) 6 (4, 12) 9 (5, 12) 4 (2, 7) 2 (1, 4)
Ratio of average sensitivity (interpolated) inside vs outside intact EZ 0.11 0.95
 Median (Q1, Q3) 8 (3, 16) 6 (2, 15) 11 (5, 17) 6 (3, 13) 16 (4, 18) 6 (3, 13)
a

Different scale (all values reported have been divided by 1000)

b

1 participant in the ARRP group was missing age of onset (a participant-reported field based on their awareness of visual symptoms) and duration of disease (computed based on age of onset and date of enrollment