Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 30;8:166. doi: 10.1038/s41531-022-00436-2

Table 3.

Neuritic plaque pathology in Lewy pathology GBS subgroups of the two datasets.

Global Lewy pathology Burden Score (GBS)
1–10 11–20 21–30 31+
CERAD Vantaa dataset
Amygdala 0-A (n) 1 0 0 0
B-C (n) 9 11 9 9
Total (n) 10 11 9 9
Brainstem/PNS 0-A (n) 8 10 6 6
B-C (n) 8 6 11 18
Total (n) 16 16 17 24
All Vantaa cases 0-A (n) 9 10 6 6
B-C (n) 17 17 20 27
Total (n) 26 27 26 33
CERAD Tokyo dataset
Amygdala 0-A (n) 11 7 7 13
B-C (n) 13 8 7 24
Total (n) 24 15 14 37
Brainstem/PNS 0-A (n) 25 10 8 0
B-C (n) 5 3 4 1
Total (n) 30 13 12 1
All Tokyo cases 0-A (n) 36 17 15 13
B-C (n) 18 11 11 25
Total (n) 54 28 26 38

Global Burden Scores (GBS) signify the summed burden of Lewy pathology. The amygdala- and brainstem/PNS-predominant cases in both datasets are divided into GBS categories of global mild (1–10), moderate (11–20), severe (21–30), and very severe (31+) Lewy pathology. In each subgroup, the number of cases (n) with CERAD stage 0-A (none, mild) and B-C (moderate, severe) is listed. Note that the table does not contain the full samples from the two datasets, since 12 (10%) Vantaa cases and 32 (18%) Tokyo cases could not be unequivocally assigned to amygdala-predominant or brainstem/PNS-predominant categories, since they had equal amounts of pathology in the AMY + TOX and DMV + sympathetic structures used for categorization of cases.