Table 5.

Comparison of various liver segmentation methods in LiTS17 test dataset

Method	Dimension	DC	DG	VOE	RVD	ASSD	MSD
Kaluva et al. [26]	2D	0.912	0.923	0.150	−0.008	6.465	45.928
Roth et al. [27]	2D	0.940	0.950	0.100	−0.050	1.890	32.710
Wardhana et al. [18]	2.5D	0.911	0.922	1.161	−0.046	3.433	50.064
Li et al. [19]	2.5D	0.961	0.965	0.074	−0.018	1.450	27.118
Jin et al. [17]	3D	0.961	0.963	0.074	0.002	1.214	26.948
Yuan [28]	3D	0.963	0.967	0.071	−0.010	1.104	23.847
Proposed method	2D	0.952	0.956	0.092	0.013	2.648	42.987

For each metric, bold value indicate the best result in that column