Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 22;35(6):1634–1647. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00655-2

Table 2.

Evaluation of proposed method using sensitivity, specificity, Dice and Jaccard similarity indexes and Hausdorff distance for HGG of BRATS 2015, BRATS 2017 and BRATS 2019, where patch pre-selection threshold is 0.9 and patch size is 5×5×5

BRATS 2015 BRATS 2017 BRATS 2019
WT TC ET WT TC ET WT TC ET
Sensitivity 0.9209 ±0.01 0.8921±0.01 0.8782±0.01 0.9212±0.01 0.9002±0.02 0.8965±0.02 0.9304±0.01 0.9104±0.01 0.9019±0.02
Specificity 0.992±0.005 0.988±0.006 0.986±0.009 0.994±0.003 0.993±0.004 0.993±0.003 0.997±0.003 0.995±0.003 0.992±0.006
PPV 0.983±0.01 0.981±0.01 0.978±0.02 0.989±0.01 0.991±0.01 0.984±0.014 0.988±0.012 0.991±0.007 0.987±0.01
Dice 0.9234±0.02 0.9038±0.015 0.9212±0.01 0.9454±0.01 0.9132±0.013 0.9362±0.01 0.9482±0.01 0.9248±0.02 0.9386±0.014
Jaccard 0.895±0.06 0.8707±0.07 0.8816±0.05 0.8919±0.04 0.8765±0.04 0.8873±0.04 0.9042±0.03 0.888±0.05 0.893±0.04
Hausdorff 5.27±1.3 5.77±1.1 5.43±1.3 4.78±2.2 5.06±1.1 5.23±2.1 4.32±2.1 4.63±2.1 4.78±2.5