Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 13;12(12):jkac278. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac278

Table 1.

Comparison of gene CNs between eMSYv3 (Janečka et al. 2018) and ddPCR analysis of the reference male Bravo and a multibreed male horse cohort.

ETSTY1 ETSTY2 ETSTY5 HSFY RBMY SRY TSPY UBA1Y
Male reference Bravo CN; eMSYv3 (Janečka et al. 2018) 3 7 8 3 2 1 13 8
Male reference Bravo mean CN; ddPCR 4.92; SD 0.26 4.58; SD 0.13 3.56; SD 0.05 1.09; SD 0.09 1.99; SD 0.03 0.90; SD 0.07 8.48; SD 0.24 3.48; SD 0.19
209 cohort mean CN 4.66 4.74 4.34 1.01 1.82 0.95 10.47 3.57
209 cohort minimum CN 1.96 2.8 1.88 0.22 0.6 0.46 5.55 1.12
209 cohort maximum CN 10.8 14 29 3 2.93 2.7 38 12.3
209 cohort SD 1.09 1.47 2.25 0.27 0.40 0.32 4.03 1.01

ddPCR data for the reference Bravo were generated from 30 technical replicates per gene and are presented with SD.