Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 1;23:1043. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05994-3

Table 2.

Comparison of the radiographic analysis between cemented and uncemented groups.

Cemented group (n = 34) Uncemented group (n = 17)
N % N % p-value
Bone resorption < 0.001
 yes 3 9 17 100
 no 31 91 0 0
Bone resorption grade medial < 0.001
 0 34 100 6 35
 1 0 0 0 0
 2 0 0 10 59
 3 0 0 1 6
Bone resorption grade lateral < 0.001
 0 31 91 1 6
 1 0 0 0 0
 2 2 6 5 29
 3 1 3 11 65
GT healed 0.48
 yes 27 79 12 71
 no 7 21 5 29
LT healed 0.18
 yes 32 94 14 82
 no 2 6 3 18
Scapular notching 0.24
 yes 6 18 1 6
 no 28 82 16 94
Scapular notching grade (1–4) 0.18
 0 28 82 16 94
 1 5 15 1 6
 2 1 3 0 0
 > 2 0 0 0 0
Lucent zones 0.06
 0 21 62 9 53
 1–2 7 21 7 41
 3–7 6 17 1 6

GT healed Greater tuberosity healed in anatomical position, LT healed Lesser tuberosity healed in anatomical position