Table 2.
Comparison of the radiographic analysis between cemented and uncemented groups.
| Cemented group (n = 34) | Uncemented group (n = 17) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | p-value | |
| Bone resorption | < 0.001 | ||||
| yes | 3 | 9 | 17 | 100 | |
| no | 31 | 91 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bone resorption grade medial | < 0.001 | ||||
| 0 | 34 | 100 | 6 | 35 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 59 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | |
| Bone resorption grade lateral | < 0.001 | ||||
| 0 | 31 | 91 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 65 | |
| GT healed | 0.48 | ||||
| yes | 27 | 79 | 12 | 71 | |
| no | 7 | 21 | 5 | 29 | |
| LT healed | 0.18 | ||||
| yes | 32 | 94 | 14 | 82 | |
| no | 2 | 6 | 3 | 18 | |
| Scapular notching | 0.24 | ||||
| yes | 6 | 18 | 1 | 6 | |
| no | 28 | 82 | 16 | 94 | |
| Scapular notching grade (1–4) | 0.18 | ||||
| 0 | 28 | 82 | 16 | 94 | |
| 1 | 5 | 15 | 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| > 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Lucent zones | 0.06 | ||||
| 0 | 21 | 62 | 9 | 53 | |
| 1–2 | 7 | 21 | 7 | 41 | |
| 3–7 | 6 | 17 | 1 | 6 | |
GT healed Greater tuberosity healed in anatomical position, LT healed Lesser tuberosity healed in anatomical position