Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 24;7(20):e162085. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.162085

Figure 1. LOESS of annualized change in BMD versus average level of insulin resistance.

Figure 1

For each midlife stage (premenopause, the MT, and postmenopause), we used LOESS to visualize the relation between annualized change in LS or FN BMD (g/cm2 per year) versus the average log2HOMA-IR. Annualized change in BMD was calculated as the difference between the last and first BMD values in a midlife stage divided by the number of intervening years. Thus, a more positive rate of change indicates slower BMD loss, and a more negative rate indicates faster BMD loss. Here, we show the LOESS plot for rate of change in LS BMD versus the average log2HOMA-IR level in premenopause. LOESS plots for the FN and the other midlife stages (menopause transition, postmenopause) were similar. Note the biphasic relation: when log2HOMA-IR was less than 1.5 (raw HOMA-IR = 2.82), greater log2HOMA-IR correlated with a more positive rate of change in BMD (slower bone loss); when log2HOMA-IR was greater than or equal to 1.5, greater log2HOMA-IR correlated with a more negative rate of change in BMD (faster bone loss).