TABLE 2.
Mutagen | Mating | Tetr coloniesb
|
Clnr coloniesc
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total no. of colonies tested | Clns | Clnr | Tets | Tetr | ||
pYT645A | 1 | 24 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
2 | 20 | 2 | 0 | |||
3 | 24 | 2 | 0 | |||
4 | 30 | 28 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
5 | 36 | 4 | 0 | |||
pYT645B | 6 | 103 | 88 | 15 | 31 | 4 |
7 | 19 | 3 | 0 | |||
8 | 50 | 9 | 0 | |||
9 | 45 | 41 | 4 | 9 | 0 | |
10 | 23 | 4 | 3 |
Each mating filter was resuspended in 3 ml of MPBS buffer. Aliquots of 0.2 ml were added to BHIS-gentamicin-rifampin-tetracycline or BHIS-gentamicin-rifampin-clindamycin plates.
Colonies on one tetracycline plate from each mating were counted, and the numbers are shown. Four plates, from matings 1, 4, 6, and 9, were replica plated onto BHIS-clindamycin plates to count Clns and Clnr colonies among the Tetr colonies.
The number of colonies on one clindamycin plate from each mating is shown. Clnr colonies were transferred to tetracycline plates individually with sterile toothpicks. There is a discrepancy between the numbers of Tetr Clnr colonies obtained in this way and the numbers obtained after an initial tetracycline selection. This may suggest that the structures of the cointegrates allow the loss of the tetQ gene by homologous recombination.