TABLE 3.
Parameter | Description | Estimate (RSE%) | IIV (RSE%)# |
---|---|---|---|
α1 | Intercept at logit level for zero craving (300/300 mg and PBO) | −2.41 (6.8) | 2.10 (4.7) |
α1 (300/100) | Intercept at logit level for zero craving (300/100 mg) | −1.87 (11) | − |
δ1 | Delta between α2 and α1 | 2.28 (1.7) | − |
δ2 | Delta between α3 and α2 | 1.85 (2.5) | − |
Emax | Maximal BUP effect | 2.87 (7.2) | 101 (7.0) |
EC50 | BUP concentration yielding 50% of Emax | 2.45 (15) | − |
βEmax (BMI) | Coefficient for BMI (power model) on Emax | 0.853 (37) | − |
#IIV was modeled assuming a normal distribution for α1 (SD shown) and a log-normal distribution for Emax (CV% shown). For the log-normal distribution, CV% was calculated as where was the variance of the related subject-specific random effect.
BMI, body mass index; BUP, buprenorphine; CV, coefficient of variation; IIV, interindividual variability; PBO, placebo; RSE, relative standard error; SD, standard deviation.