Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 18;13:1017319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017319

Table 2.

Fixed effects of classification group, age group and block on response times (compatible trials analysis).

Model term B SE t p 95% CI for Exp(B)
LL UL
Intercept 6.93 0.05 131.76 < 0.001 6.83 7.03
classification group (CWS) −0.06 0.07 −0.77 0.44 −0.20 0.09
Block (mixed-set-shifting) 0.54 0.04 15.29 < 0.001 0.47 0.61
Block (mixed-no set-shifting) 0.25 0.04 7.00 < 0.001 0.18 0.31
Age group (older) −0.29 0.08 −3.89 < 0.001 −0.44 −0.15
Classification group (CWS) × Block (mixed-set-shifting) 0.03 0.05 0.63 0.53 −0.07 0.13
Classification group (CWS) × Block (mixed-no set-shifting) 0.05 0.05 1.04 0.30 −0.05 0.15
Classification group (CWS) × age group (older) −0.11 0.11 −1.06 0.29 −0.32 0.10
Mixed block (set-shifting) × age group (older) 0.21 0.05 4.14 < 0.001 0.11 0.31
Mixed block (no set-shifting) × age group (older) 0.27 0.05 5.36 < 0.001 0.17 0.37
Classification group (CWS) × Block (mixed-set-shifting) × age group (older) 0.08 0.07 1.09 0.28 −0.06 0.22
Classification group (CWS) × Block (mixed-no set-shifting) × age group (older) −0.03 0.07 −0.35 0.73 −0.16 0.11

The model included the random effect of an individual-level intercept. CI = Confidence Interval; LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit.