Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 20;47(4):172–183. doi: 10.1584/jpestics.D22-030

Fig. 2. Genetic tree analysis of 91 isolates of CGSC, using ApMAT, ACT, ITS, CHS-1, and GAPDH gene sequence for analysis using Bayesian inference (BI) C. boninense CBS123755 as an outgroup. Thick red lines indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) above 95%. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values (MLB ≥50%) and maximum parsimony bootstrap supports (MPB ≥50%) are given at the nodes (MLB/MPB). *=ex-holotype or ex-epitype culture. (a 88 CGSC isolates were close to C. siamense; b three CGSC isolates (MLDH92, HCKS12 and MLST125) were close to C. fructicola).

Fig. 2. Genetic tree analysis of 91 isolates of CGSC, using ApMAT, ACT, ITS, CHS-1, and GAPDH gene sequence for analysis using Bayesian inference (BI) C. boninense CBS123755 as an outgroup. Thick red lines indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) above 95%. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values (MLB ≥50%) and maximum parsimony bootstrap supports (MPB ≥50%) are given at the nodes (MLB/MPB). *=ex-holotype or ex-epitype culture. (a 88 CGSC isolates were close to C. siamense; b three CGSC isolates (MLDH92, HCKS12 and MLST125) were close to C. fructicola)