Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 18;13:952925. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952925

TABLE 1.

Statistical results from the latent profile analysis (t1).

Model LL #fp AIC BIC aBIC AWE cmP Entropy
(1) Profile −1106.485 6 2224.971 2245.082 2226.07 2239.42 0.000 NA
(2) Profiles −1043.078 10 2106.156 2139.674 2107.988 2130.23 0.000 0.776
(3) Profiles −1017.454 14 2062.908 2109.834 2065.473 2096.63 0.992 0.783
(4) Profiles −1011.576 18 2059.153 2119.486 2062.451 2102.50 0.008 0.83
(5) Profiles −1006.021 22 2056.041 2129.782 2060.073 2109.03 0.000 0.735
(6) Profiles −1001.529 26 2055.058 2142.206 2059.822 2117.68 0.000 0.742
(7) Profiles −996.433 30 2052.866 2153.422 2058.363 2125.12 0.000 0.825
(8) Profiles −990.522 34 2049.045 2163.008 2055.275 2130.93 0.000 0.808
(9) Profiles −983.839 38 2043.678 2171.049 2050.641 2135.20 0.000 0.834
(10) Profiles −978.752 42 2041.504 2182.282 2049.2 2142.66 0.000 0.856

LL, model log-likelihood; #fp, number of free parameters; AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; aBIC, (samplesize) adjusted BIC; AWE, approximate weight of evidence criterion; cmP, correct model Probability.