Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 18;13:952925. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952925

TABLE 4.

Statistical results from the latent profile analysis (t2).

Model LL #fp AIC BIC aBIC AWE cmP Entropy
(1) Profile −264.689 6 541.378 552.969 534.131 555.83 0.126 NA
(2) Profiles −257.882 10 535.765 555.083 523.687 559.85 0.044 0.725
(3) Profiles −247.120 14 522.24 549.285 505.331 555.96 0.795 0.849
(4) Profiles −242.392 18 520.785 555.558 499.045 564.14 0.850 0.85
(5) Profiles −239.154 22 522.308 564.808 495.737 575.29 0.000 0.862
(6) Profiles −236.724 26 525.449 575.676 494.047 588.07 0.000 0.907
(7) Profiles −229.000 30 518.043 575.998 481.81 590.30 0.000 0.968
(8) Profiles −224.145 34 516.29 581.972 475.226 598.18 0.000 0.979
(9) Profiles −218.570 38 513.14 586.549 467.245 604.66 0.000 0.969
(10) Profiles −213.593 42 511.186 592.322 460.46 612.34 0.000 0.856

LL, model log-likelihood; #fp, number of free parameters; AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; aBIC, (samplesize) adjusted BIC; AWE, approximate weight of evidence criterion; cmP, correct model Probability.