Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 2;11:117. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-01046-z

Table 2.

Goodness-of-fit test results of the two models (Models A and B) in the study areas

Region Ip1 In1 Ip2 In2
R2 P R2 P R2 P R2 P
Model A
 Wuhan City 0.882 < 0.001 0.55 < 0.001 0.49 < 0.001 0.857 < 0.001
 Jilin Province 0.939 < 0.001 0.834 < 0.001 0.781 < 0.001 0.823 < 0.001
 Xiamen City 0.105 < 0.001 0.156 < 0.001 0.202 < 0.001 0.708 < 0.001
 Chuxiong Prefecture 0.971 < 0.001 0.971 < 0.001 0.752 < 0.001 0.619 < 0.001
Model B
 Wuhan City 0.236 < 0.001 0.083 < 0.001 0.337 < 0.001 0.761 < 0.001
 Jilin Province 0.961 < 0.001 0.615 < 0.001 0.489 < 0.001 0.559 < 0.001
 Xiamen City 0.039 0.009 0.009 0.202 0.239 < 0.001 0.399 < 0.001
 Chuxiong Prefecture 0.978 < 0.001 0.977 < 0.001 0.952 < 0.001 0.818 < 0.001

Correlation between the simulated and observed data was tested using R2 and p values. We divided all the compartments representing active diseases (I) into four occupational compartments: pathogen positive students (Ip1 subscript), pathogen positive non-students (Ip2 subscript), pathogen negative students (In1 subscript) and pathogen negative non-students (In2 subscript)