DIAGNOSIS
|
1 |
Can a combination of data indicating an increased severity of clinical symptoms, worsening of respiratory function parameters, and progression of lesions in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) serve as a basis for the diagnosis of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD)? |
We suggest that the basis for the diagnosis of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) should be an increased severity of clinical symptoms, worsening of pulmonary function parameters, and progression of lesions in high-resolution computed tomography of the chest. |
Very low |
Conditional |
2 |
In each patient with fibrotic interstitial lung disease, should we aim at establishing a precise diagnosis of the underlying disease? |
We recommend that in every patient with fibrotic interstitial lung disease, we should aim for establishing a precise diagnosis of the underlying disease. |
Very low |
Strong |
3 |
Is it necessary to perform serological tests for autoimmune diseases in every patient with fibrotic interstitial lung disease of unknown etiology? |
We recommend that every patient with fibrotic interstitial lung disease of unknown etiology should undergo serological tests for autoimmune diseases. |
Very low |
Strong |
4 |
Is an opinion of a multidisciplinary team necessary for establishing a diagnosis of a fibrotic interstitial lung disease? |
We recommend that an opinion of a multidisciplinary team should be taken into account in the diagnostics of fibrotic interstitial lung disease. |
Very low |
Strong |
5 |
Should a patient with an interstitial lung disease other than IPF who does not meet the criteria for the progressive fibrosis phenotype be monitored for progression? |
We recommend that a patient with an interstitial lung disease other than IPF who does not meet the criteria for the progressive fibrosis phenotype should be monitored for progression. |
Very low |
Strong |
6 |
Should patients with systemic autoimmune diseases be monitored regularly for signs of interstitial lung disease? |
We recommend that patients with systemic autoimmune diseases should be regularly monitored for signs of interstitial lung disease. |
Very low |
Strong |
TREATMENT
|
1 |
Should patients with an ILD in the course of systemic autoimmune diseases be managed by a multidisciplinary team? |
We recommend that an opinion of a multidisciplinary team should be considered in the management of patients with interstitial lung disease in the course of systemic autoimmune diseases. |
Very low |
Strong |
2 |
Should a patient with a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) other than IPF be treated with first-line therapy dedicated to the diagnosed underlying disease? |
We suggest that a patient with a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) other than IPF should be treated with first-line therapy dedicated to the diagnosed underlying disease. |
Very low |
Conditional |
3 |
In a patient with a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) other than IPF, should anti-fibrotic therapy with nintedanib be used in the event of ineffectiveness of the therapy recommended for the treatment of the underlying disease? |
We recommend that in a patient with a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) other than IPF, anti-fibrotic therapy with nintedanib should be used in the event of ineffectiveness of the therapy recommended for the treatment of the underlying disease. |
Low |
Strong |
4 |
In a patient with a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) other than IPF, should anti-fibrotic therapy with pirfenidone be used in the event of ineffectiveness of the therapy recommended for the treatment of the underlying disease? |
No recommendations were made for or against the use of anti-fibrotic therapy with pirfenidone if treatment of the underlying disease has failed in a patient with a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) other than IPF. |
Very low |
Not issued |
5 |
Is it possible to use an anti-fibrotic agent as a first-choice therapy (without the need for previous immunomodulatory treatment) in certain clinical situations (UIP or fibrotic NSIP pattern)? |
We suggest using an anti-fibrotic agent as the first-choice treatment in certain clinical situations. |
Very low |
Conditional |
6 |
Can a patient with a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) other than IPF receive simultaneous treatment with a disease-modifying drug and anti-fibrotic therapy? |
We suggest that in a patient with a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) other than IPF, one should consider simultaneous treatment with a disease-modifying drug and anti-fibrotic therapy. |
Very low |
Conditional |
7 |
Should progression noted during treatment with an anti-fibrotic agent in a patient with a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) other than IPF be a reason for discontinuation of anti-fibrotic therapy? |
No recommendations were made for or against the termination of anti-fibrotic therapy in the case of noted progression during treatment of a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) other than IPF. |
Very low |
Not issued |
8 |
Should the same principles of non-pharmacological and palliative treatment and eligibility for lung transplantation be applied in a patient with an interstitial lung disease other than IPF with progressive fibrosis as in a patient with IPF? |
We recommend that the same principles of non-pharmacological and palliative treatment and eligibility for lung transplantation should be applied in a patient with an interstitial lung disease other than IPF with progressive fibrosis as in a patient with IPF. |
Very low |
Strong |