Skip to main content
. 2022 May 16;5(3):e000374. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2021-000374

Table 3.

Complications leading to revision procedure during 18 months of follow-up

Initial therapy VP shunt (n=26) ETV (n=23)
25 revisions in 12 children 30 revisions in 15 children
Therapy at the time point before revision Still treated with VP shunt Switched to VP shunt Still treated with ETV
25 revisions in 12 children 11 revisions in 5 children 19 revisions in 15 children
Cause of revision* (more than one may apply)
 Obstruction of catheter or ETV 6 (24) 4 (36.4) 10 (52.6)
 CSF leakage 6 (24) 4 (36.4) 3 (15.8)
 Catheter displacement 3 (12) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Infection 5 (20) 3 (27.3) 3 (15.8)
 Dysfunctional valve 2 (8) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Unknown 7 (28) 2 (18.2) 3 (15.8)

* Data are presented as number (percentage).

CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ETV, endoscopic third ventriculostomy; VP shunt, ventriculoperitoneal shunt.