Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 5;4(4):100318. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100318

Table 3.

Estimated differences in mean articular cartilage thickness in different intraarticular areas post-PRP treatment (as compared with cartilage thickness pre-treatment).

Areas of measurement No. of studies (knees) Estimated difference in means (95%CI) Heterogeneity
τ2 I2 Q value P value
MFC 5 (313) [20,22,23,27,28] 0.068 (−0.05 - 0.185), p ​= ​0.259 0.01 86.284 29.163 <0.001
LFC 4 (210) [22,23,27,28] 0.064 (−0.02 - 0.148), p ​= ​0.136 0.002 24.568 3.977 0.264
MTP 2 (87) [22,23] −0.105 (−0.290 - 0.079), p ​= ​0.263 <0.001 <0.001 0.804 0.370
LTP 2 (87) [22,23] −0.019 (−0.214 – 0.176), p ​= ​0.848 <0.001 <0.001 0.648 0.421
Overall (MFC, LFC, MTP, LTP) 3 (145) [22,24,26] −0.075 (−0.300 – 0.150), p ​= ​0.513 0.017 44.705 3.617 0.164

PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma, CI: Confidence Interval, MFC: medial femoral condyle, LFC: lateral femoral condyle.

MTP: medial tibial plateau, LTP: lateral tibial plateau, p<0.05: significant.