Abstract
Objective: to determine the accuracy of infrared (IR)-based serum biomarker profiling to differentiate horses with early inflammatory changes associated with a traumatically induced model of equine carpal osteoarthritis (OA) from controls.
Method: unilateral carpal OA was induced in 9 of 17 healthy Thoroughbred fillies, while the remainder served as sham operated controls. Serum samples were obtained before induction of OA (Day 0) and weekly thereafter until Day 63 from both groups. Films of dried serum were created, and IR absorbance spectra acquired. Following pre-processing, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to assess group and time differences and generate predictive models for wavenumber ranges 1300-1800 cm−1 and 2600-3700 cm−1.
Results: the overall correct classification rate when classifying samples by group (OA or Sham) was 52.7% (s.d. = 12.8%), while it was 94.0% (s.d. = 1.4%) by sampling Day. The correct classification results by group-sampling Day combinations with pre-intervention serum (Day 0) was 50.5% (s.d. = 21.7%).
Conclusion: with the current approach IR spectroscopic analysis could not differentiate serum of horses with induced carpal OA from that of controls. The high classification rate obtained by Day of sampling may reflect the effect of exercise on the biomarker profile. A longer study period (advanced disease) or naturally occurring disease may provide further information on the suitability of this technique in horses.
Keywords: Spectroscopy, Equine, Serum, Biomarker, Osteoarthritis
1. Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause of joint disease in humans and is responsible for significant morbidity, with clinical signs such as pain and disability leading to marked economic losses worldwide [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. It is estimated that 100 million Europeans suffer from OA [5], with knee OA estimated to affect between 18 and 40% of 60–79 year old people [6,7]. In the U.S. over 91 million adults (37%) were affected by OA in 2015 [8]. Similarly, joint disease represents a significant clinical condition in horses. Approximately 50 ± 3.2% of U.S. multi-horse operations experience one or more lameness cases annually, with approximately 50% limb or joint related [9]. In 2007, 4 million of the 7.3 million horses in the U.S. were estimated to be affected by OA, with a negative impact on 4.6 million people (owners, service providers, and businesses) associated with the equine industry producing goods and services of US$38.3 billion [10].
Compared with advances in human orthopedic research [11], there is a lack of a validated and repeatable approach to staging clinical osteoarthritis in the horse and case definitions referable to OA in specific joints. This has led to reliance upon well-validated models of traumatic OA in the horse as a proxy for naturally occurring disease, particularly in its early stages [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16]]. The need for inexpensive and reliable tests for early detection remains; it is currently difficult to obtain an early diagnosis of OA and objectively monitor disease progression or response to therapy in clinical cases [17].
Many different soluble biomarkers associated with joint metabolism and pathology have been investigated as potential markers of OA [[18], [19], [20]]. In parallel with medical advances, a significant body of research in horses has been published, and progress has been made in identifying potentially clinically useful markers of OA [12,16,21]. Despite advancements in biomarker research [[22], [23], [24], [25]] and limited application to equine clinical cases [26], the wider adoption and validation within a clinical practice setting of candidate biomarkers is yet to be established [19]. The main limitations of the techniques evaluated are the lack of consistency, the limited practicality of the tests in a clinical setting, and the relatively high costs when used as a tool for disease surveillance [27].
Fourier-transform infrared (IR) spectroscopy has been used to identify a “biochemical fingerprint” of all molecules in biofluids, rather than separating single molecules or biomarkers associated with a disease or physiological states [28]. It provides a means for detecting quantitative and qualitative changes in the molecular profile of a biofluid, accounting for known and unknown markers of disease. This aspect is particularly important since it is recognized that OA may be initiated by trauma and inflammation in any or all of the multiple joint tissues, including the synovial membrane, fibrous joint capsule, subchondral bone, periarticular ligaments or articular cartilage [29]. The advantages of IR spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool are its high sensitivity and specificity in other diagnostic applications [30,31], the low cost (no reagents are required), and the low-invasive nature of the sample collection (serum) for testing. This technique has been investigated as a potential diagnostic and screening tool for joint disease in human synovial fluid [[32], [33], [34]] and serum [35], focusing on rheumatoid arthritis. However, these investigations have been in clinical cases with advanced disease and not applied to early detection of OA. In a rabbit model of knee osteoarthritis, IR spectroscopy of serum proved to be a sensitive approach to differentiate between rabbits with OA and controls [36]. This model produces severe acute joint instability, rather than focal osteochondral trauma often seen in young human and equine athletes [37,38]. Serum-based IR spectroscopy is capable of differentiating dogs with naturally occurring knee OA from unmatched controls [39]. In the horse, synovial fluid IR spectroscopy has been used in the diagnosis of clinical osteochondrosis and traumatic osteoarthritis [38,40]. This method has been applied to the diagnosis of clinical OA based on spectra of equine serum, but the comparison group used in this study was not verified as free of OA [41].
The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility and accuracy of IR-based serum biomarker profiling to differentiate horses with early inflammatory changes associated with a traumatically induced model of equine carpal OA from controls. Our hypothesis is that IR biomarker profiling of serum will be able to differentiate horses with induced carpal OA from controls.
2. Method
This randomized prospective experimental study was approved by the Massey University Animal Ethics Committee (MUAEC 14/18). The sample size for treatment and control groups was estimated based upon previous publications using the same model for biomarker and treatment trials [[12], [13], [14], [15]].
2.1. Animals
As part of a larger biomarker study, fifteen 2-year-old and two 3-year-old female Thoroughbred horses (n = 17) not previously used or trained for any athletic activity were selected for the study. The inclusion criteria were lack of clinical abnormalities on physical examination by two equine surgical specialists, absence of lameness at the walk and trot before and after limb flexion tests, and no abnormalities on radiographs of the carpi immediately before the study. All horses were kept on grass pasture before the study. Nine horses were randomly assigned to the OA group, and eight to the Sham horse group, after blocking horses for sire and age. The order of procedures, Sham operation or surgical OA induction, was randomized. At the end of the trial the horses in the OA group were euthanised for tissue collection as part of another study (unpublished data), while Sham operated horses were rehomed.
OA group: Procaine penicillin at 22 mg/kg IM (Phoenix Pharmacillin 300, 300 mg/mL, Phoenix Pharm, New Zealand) was administered to all horses once before surgical intervention. All horses then were subjected to general anesthesia for arthroscopic surgery. Anesthesia was induced with 2.5 mg/kg of ketamine (Ceva Ketamine injection; Ceva Animal Health Pty Ltd. Australia) and 0.01 mg/kg of Diazepam (ilium Diazepam Injection USP; Troy Laboratories, Australia) intravenously. Following orotracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (Isoflurane; Bayer New Zealand Ltd, New Zealand) in 5 L/min of 100% oxygen. Following general anesthetic induction and aseptic preparation of a randomly chosen carpus, an 8 mm osteochondral fragment was arthroscopically created in the middle carpal joint using a bone gouge in the distal dorsal aspect of the radial carpal bone to induce traumatic OA as previously described [14,15]. The osteochondral fragment remained attached to the dorsal joint capsule reflection. The parent bone from where the fragment had been separated was debrided with a motorized bone burr to create a ∼15 mm-wide defect (including the width of the fragment). The articular debris was left in the joint. These horses were identified as the OA horse group. All horses were administered phenylbutazone immediately after completion of the procedure at 4.4 mg/kg IV (Nabudone P, 200 mg/mL, Troy Laboratories, Australia) and for the following four days at 4.4 mg/kg PO, every 24 h (Equine Bute Paste, 200 mg/mL, Randlab, Australia). Postoperatively horses were examined twice daily to evaluate their comfort and well-being.
Sham control group: Sham horses underwent arthroscopic exploration only of one randomly selected middle carpal joint. The perioperative pharmaceutical treatment protocol and monitoring plan was identical to that of the OA group.
2.2. Post-operative exercise and clinical assessment
After a 14-day recovery period in horse stalls with 30 min of daily turnout in a 6 m × 6 m yard, a 7-week-long treadmill exercise protocol (5 days a week) was initiated. Horses were exercised daily for 2 min at a trot (4–5 m/s), then 2 min at a gallop (8–9 m/s), and then 2 min at a trot (4–5 m/s). The model mimics naturally occurring equine traumatic OA [12,13]. Scores were assigned on a weekly basis for lameness, joint effusion and response to carpal flexion and at the end of the study for radiographic changes (Supplementary Tables 1-4, Appendix A) as confirmation of the establishment of OA [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16]].
2.3. Serum sample collection
Blood (∼10 mL) was collected by left jugular venipuncture immediately before induction of OA (or Sham surgery) (Day 0), and then weekly from all horses until Day 63. After collection, blood samples were allowed to clot in plain tubes, and 4–5 mL of serum obtained after centrifugation at 5000 rpm (3400 g) for 5 min within 60 min of sample collection. The serum was divided into 1 mL aliquots and stored at −80 °C until later analysis.
2.4. Infrared spectroscopy
Serum samples were thawed at room temperature and replicate (x 6) dry films made for each sample on a silicon 96-well microplate [17,38,39]. The microplate was mounted on a multi-sampler accessory (XY Microtiter Plate Accessory, PIKE Technologies, Madison, WI, USA) interfaced with an IR spectrometer (Tensor 27, Bruker Optics, Preston, Victoria, Australia). Infrared absorbance spectra in the range of 400 to 4000 cm−1 were generated and recorded with proprietary software (OPUS software, version 6.5, Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany). For each acquisition, 512 interferograms were averaged, and Fourier transformed to obtain a spectrum with a resolution of 4 cm−1.
2.5. Analyses and model development for classification of spectral data
Spectral files were imported into proprietary spectral manipulation software (The Unscrambler Xv10.5.1, Camo Software, Oslo, Norway) and converted into delimited csv files for further analyses. All subsequent analyses were performed in R (V3.6.3, R Core Team, Auckland, New Zealand; ChemoSpec and MixOmix packages V 4.3.34 and V6.8.5 respectively).
Spectral pre-processing: Savitzky-Golay filtering was applied to all spectra with a 1st-order derivative of the signal, a 1st order polynomials function and a smoothing window of width 5; parameters were tuned to maximize spectral separation by Day. An analysis of sensitivity was performed, and similar performances were also retrieved for other combinations of filter parameters. Then, standard normal variate (SNV) transformation was used to normalize spectra and remove baseline effects, reducing within-class variance [42]. Spectra values in the “fingerprint” regions between 1300 and 1800 cm−1 and 2600-3700 cm−1 were selected for further analyses. We did not remove any outlier samples as their number did not exceed the threshold of extreme PCA scores expected by chance (5%), and further inspection did not reveal any anomaly with the samples.
Classification model development: a series of predictive models were built to predict the horse group (task i; OA vs Sham), the sampling Day (task ii; 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 and 63) and to assign samples a day-group class label, except Day 0 (i.e. prior to interventions) for which OA and Sham groups were pooled (task iii; n = 19 classes). Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) [43] was initially used in multilevel mode to account for repeated measures. Predictions were made using the first ten (10) principal components (PC) of the PLSDA as no significant performance improvement was observed with >10 PCs and more than 50% of the variance of the design matrix was accounted for in all explored scenarios. More specifically, scores along each PC was computed for each new sample. Then new samples were assigned to the class with the closest centroid, relying on the Mahalanobis metric, as it was observed to lead to the most accurate class prediction [44]. The classification rates were computed based on the classification outcome of the spectra from each horse. Each horse was used in turn as a test horse (“leave-one-horse-out”), while all other horses (16) were used for model training. For task i, we denoted TP1 as the count (among all the leave one horse out repeats) of the true OA spectra correctly classified as OA, FP1 as the count of true OA spectra wrongly classified as Sham spectra, TP2 as the count of true Sham spectra correctly classified as Sham, and FP2 as the count of true Sham spectra wrongly classified as OA spectra. Then, the OA classification rate was defined as TP1/(TP1+FP1), the Sham classification rate was defined as TP2/(TP2+FP2), and the overall classification rate was defined as (TP1+TP2)/(TP + TP2+FP + FP2). We defined the overall and class-specific classification rates similarly for tasks ii and iii.
Logistic and multinomial regression with L1-regularization, random forests, Support Vector Machines and convolutional neural networks were also explored as classification methods to check that the PLSDA underlying assumptions were not limiting the performance. The performance of these different models offered no significant advantage over, and was similar to, that obtained with PLSDA. Moreover, PLSDA offered a visualisation of the samples by plotting their scores in its principal component space. Therefore, only the results obtained with PLSDA are reported.
3. Results
3.1. Spectral pre-processing
The normalized spectra of serum from OA and Sham groups are shown in Fig. 1a (left). There was no visually apparent difference in the pattern between the two groups. The greater peaks reflecting infrared absorption are associated with proteins: bands centred at 1650 cm−1(amide I) and 1545 cm−1 (amide II) correspond to stretching and bending vibrations on the amide C=O and N–H groups, respectively; the broadband at 3300 cm−1 corresponds to the N–H group as well, but is a stretching vibration called the amide A mode [45]. The image of the pre-processed spectra is shown in Fig. 1b (right).
Fig. 1.
a and b. Spectra are shown (left). Savitzky-Golay filtered and smoothed spectra in fingerprint regions (3700-2600 cm−1 and 1800-1300 cm−1) are shown (right). The median (thick line) and 2.5%- and 97.5%-quantiles (thin lines) for both groups are shown: osteoarthritis (OA) in red, Sham in blue. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
3.2. Classification of IR spectra from OA versus sham horses
The overall correct classification rate when classifying sample spectra according to their treatment group (OA or Sham) was 52.7% (s.d. = 12.8%) using 10 PC, with 50.2% of the total variance explained. Fig. 2 shows the lack of clear separation for the first 2 components in the first sample space. The classification rates obtained overall and for each group (OA or Sham) for a number of PC comprised between 1 and 10 is shown inSupplementary Fig. 1. Although the total variance associated with the model increases with the number of PCs, the classification accuracy is not improved by using more PCs.
Fig. 2.
Sample score plots by group for the first 2 components of partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) (task i). Osteoarthritis (OA) horses in red circles, Sham in blue triangles. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Classification of IR spectra at different sampling times (Days).
The overall correct classification rate for samples according to their sampling Day (Days 0–63) was 94.0% (s.d. = 1.4%) when using 10 PC, with 53.2% of the total variance explained. The classification rates obtained overall and for each sampling Day for a number of PC comprised between 1 and 10 are reported in Supplementary Fig. 2. Fig. 3a–c are plots of all samples in the first 3 PC defined by the PLSDA performed with sampling Day as the outcome (not applying the leave-one-horse-out scheme).
Fig. 3.
a, b, c. Sample plots of the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) for sample day identification (task ii) in the first three principal components (PC) (a, PC2 vs PC1, top left; b, PC3 vs PC1, bottom left; and c, PC2 vs PC 3, top right).
3.3. Classification of group-sampling day combinations with serum from day 0
For task iii, the overall classification rate is 50.5% (s.d. = 21.7%) using 10 PC, with 53.2% of the total variance explained. All class-specific classification rates for this task are reported in Supplementary Table 5 and Supplementary Fig. 3.
The specificity for a class (group x Day) identification varies. Sampling Day identification was still performed accurately, with classification rates similar to those shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. However, within sampling Days, the correct identification of groups (OA vs Sham) was limited, with classification rates ranging from 94.1% for samples collected prior to interventions (Day 0) to 85.0% (Day 35, Sham) and 20.0% (Day 42, OA). Lastly, Fig. 4 (a, b, c) shows all samples for the first three PC of the PLSDA for this task (not applying the leave-one-horse-out scheme) and confirms the lack of separation by group. Incidentally, the separation of spectra by days is observed for a few samples.
Fig. 4.
a, b, c. Individual sample partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) score plots in the first three planes for task iii. Samples are presented by Day (colour-coded) and groups: circles represent osteoarthritis (OA) samples, while triangles represent Sham samples. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
4. Discussion
This study is the first to attempt evaluation of IR spectroscopy and spectral analyses to discriminate between serum from horses with traumatically induced OA and strictly characterized controls. However, our results showed that the approach described here failed to differentiate serum spectra of horses with early traumatically induced osteoarthritic changes (OA) from those of controls (Sham). Significant differences in the spectroscopic profile of serum were detected at different time points during a postoperative exercise program in both groups.
In a previous experimental study in rabbits using a model of knee OA (cranial cruciate ligament transection inducing marked instability) IR spectroscopy on serum allowed differentiation of affected animals from controls at biweekly intervals between 2 and 12 weeks post injury [36]. The joint instability created with this model results in early onset of OA, with a severe and debilitating burden of disease of all articular structures within 2 weeks, sufficient to contribute to detectable changes in the IR spectrum of rabbit serum [46]. Similarly, IR spectroscopy was able to identify serum of dogs with naturally occurring knee OA associated with cranial cruciate ligament rupture from controls, with high sensitivity and specificity [39]. In this prospective controlled study, the dogs recruited had clinically evident naturally occurring OA due to joint instability that was sufficiently advanced to warrant surgical intervention. The equine model used in the current study does not create marked joint instability. In agreement with other reports using the model, clinical signs attributed to the osteochondral fragments were minimal [12,14,15]. This model has been sufficient to demonstrate biochemical differences based on ELISA biomarkers [12]. However, a more severe equine model of joint injury that includes instability, or prolonged follow-up period, may be required to exploit the discriminatory potential of IR spectroscopy of serum.
In contrast with our study, others utilizing the same equine model and one of naturally occurring OA in similarly aged horses of the same breed have demonstrated significant differences in specific ELISA based biomarkers (e.g. epitope CS846 and type II collagen carboxy-propeptide) between OA and control groups [12,26]. Although an IR spectroscopy-based approach provides for a broad-based “fingerprint” of known and unknown biomarkers, few IR based assays of biofluids rely upon the detection of a single molecular species. Where such assays are successful, they are typically for biomolecules in high concentrations (e.g. immunoglobulins) that overshadow contributions to serum IR spectra of solutes in lower concentrations [30,31,47]. In the case of previously established ELISA-based soluble biomarkers for this equine model, concentrations in the serum are 25–1000 fold lower than in synovial fluid, and these levels approach or are below the detection threshold for a single molecular species with mid-IR transmission spectroscopy [12,26,47]. In contrast, IR spectroscopy is effective at identifying synovial fluid from horses affected by osteochondrosis and traumatic arthritis from controls, presumably because disease-related IR active biomolecules are in sufficient concentrations for IR based detection and discrimination [38,40]. To improve the quantification of proteins with low serum concentrations (e.g. immunoglobulin A) an ultrafiltration method has been described to separate molecules based on their molecular size [48]. In future studies, pre-processing of serum samples with techniques such as ultrafiltration may enhance the relative contribution of specific proteins in the IR spectral profile but is unlikely to separate specific peptides or glycosaminoglycan-based biomarkers.
A recent study utilizing IR spectroscopy of serum claimed success in discriminating between horses with naturally occurring OA from controls [41]. The study compared 15 horses with OA and 48 designated controls. Serum from horses affected with metacarpophalangeal, metatarsophalangeal or carpal joints were included. However, conventional and IR-based comparisons of equine synovial fluid from different normal joints differ significantly biochemically [49,50]. Therefore, in our study a single joint was evaluated to eliminate possible variability arising from different anatomic locations. The control group in the report by Paraskevaidi et al. (2020) included 12 different breeds, ranging in age from 1 day to 26 years, and the clinical OA group consisted only of Thoroughbred racehorses ranging in age from 3 to 10 years. Age has been recognized to play an effect on clinical disease and on the performance of IR-based spectroscopy techniques in horses affected by osteochondrosis and dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture associated OA [39,40]. Therefore, in agreement with the approach taken by others [12,26], we report the narrow inclusion criteria of unraced 2 to 3-year-old female Thoroughbreds to minimize the possible confounding effects of age or gender on biomarker profiles. Nevertheless, the narrow selection criteria included in the current study did not improve the ability of IR spectroscopy to detect changes associated with induced OA.
Excellent classification rates by sampling Day were obtained when using 10 PC of the PLSDA. There was clear separation of classes for samples collected at Day 0 and 7. Lameness, flexion test, and effusion scores were significantly different between these days for the OA group(Supplementary Tables 1-3) providing clinical evidence of inflammation. For the Sham group only lameness and effusion scores were significantly different, suggesting perhaps a less severe inflammatory response. However, differences in these scores between OA and Sham groups were not significant. This may be attributed to the clinical response to the use of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for five days following arthroscopy in both groups (as dictated by the animal ethics protocol).
The inability to reliably classify the treatment group (OA or Sham) at the remaining sampling times may reflect the effect of exercise on the biomarker profile contained within the serum spectra rather than disease [12,51]. This finding is in agreement with previous works using the same equine model that found significant changes in the concentrations of specific soluble biomarkers (epitope CS846, epitope CPII, glycosaminoglycans, osteocalcin, type 1 and 2 collagen degradation fragments, and bone specific type I collagen) in serum in response to the same exercise protocol [12]. Adaptations to exercise are complex and encompass the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, respiratory, and other systems. The IR-active biomolecular contributions to each spectrum reflect both physiologic (i.e. exercise induced or natural temporal variations) and disease (OA) contributions. In the current study, the exercise-related changes in the spectra may have obscured the detection of those associated with early disease-related responses in the equine OA model.
The comparison of group-sampling day combination with serum from Day 0 was performed in an attempt to further explore the poor results observed for the OA-Sham analysis. However, the results were highly variable with performance best at Day 35. Although the precise reasons for these results are unknown, the limitations discussed above are likely to apply similarly.
A limitation of our study was the lack of an age-matched unexercised control group, which did not allow the determination of the role of exercise on IR spectra. Moreover, although the selection criteria of the animals in our study (young age, female gender and Thoroughbred breed) were chosen to limit variability, differences may exist in serum spectra of animals of different age, gender or breed, which were not explored in this study. In addition, the IR spectra obtained in horses with induced OA may differ significantly from those in horses with naturally occurring OA.
In conclusion, this is the first study to investigate the use of IR spectroscopy on serum from horses with traumatically induced OA. This technique did not facilitate the early discrimination of horses affected by OA from controls. A prospective study using horses affected by naturally occurring OA with precise case definitions and appropriately matched controls may provide more useful information on the suitability of this technique in horses.
Author contributions
The authors’ contributions included concept and study design (LP, CBR), data analysis and interpretation (LP, MV, KED, MRW, CBR), statistical analysis (MV, CBR), animal recruitment (CWR, CBR), serum sampling (LP), surgical induction of OA (LP, CWM), provision of general anesthesia (HS), radiographic assessment (SP, MO), treadmill exercise (LP), obtaining funding (CBR), preparation of draft article (LP, MV, KED, MRW, CBR). All authors provided feedback and approved the final version of the article.
Role of funding source
This study was funded by the New Zealand Equine Trust. The Chair of New Zealand Equine Trust (C.W. McIlwraith) was involved in surgical creation of OA for his expertise with the model of equine OA used in this study. He has also reviewed the manuscript prior to submission, but was not involved in study design, data collection or analysis.
Declaration of competing interest
One of the authors (C.W. McIlwraith) is the Chair of the New Zealand Equine Trust.
Acknowledgements
We thank Brooke Adams for her assistance in sample preparation and collection of IR spectra from the samples, and Marty Johnson for handling and caring for the horses and for his expertise with the treadmill exercise.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100297.
Contributor Information
L. Panizzi, Email: L.Panizzi@massey.ac.nz.
M. Vignes, Email: M.Vignes@massey.ac.nz.
K.E. Dittmer, Email: K.E.Dittmer@massey.ac.nz.
M.R. Waterland, Email: M.Waterland@massey.ac.nz.
C.W. Rogers, Email: C.W.Rogers@massey.ac.nz.
H. Sano, Email: hiloki50@me.com.
C.W. McIlwraith, Email: Wayne.Mcilwraith@ColoState.EDU.
S. Pemberton, Email: sarah@vet2020.com.
M. Owen, Email: mark@nzradvet.co.nz.
C.B. Riley, Email: C.B.Riley@massey.ac.nz.
Appendix ASupplementary data
The following are the Supplementary data to this article:
Lameness scores of the osteoarthritis (OA) and Sham groups over time (0 = sound; 5 = non weight bearing lameness).
Flexion test scores of the osteoarthritis (OA) and Sham groups over time (0 = normal; 4 = severe).
Effusion scores of the osteoarthritis (OA) and Sham groups over time (0 = normal; 4 = severe).
Median radiographic scores of the osteoarthritis (OA) and Sham groups for osteophytosis (0 = normal; 3 = severe) and lysis (0 = normal; 3 = diffuse/deep) before intervention and at the end of the study period.
Correct classification rates for classification task iii between Day 0 and all group-Day combinations (osteoarthritis (OA) top and Sham bottom).
Supplementary Fig. 1.
Correct classification rates overall (thick black line) and by horse group (two thin lines, red for osteoarthritis (OA), blue for Sham) as a function of the number of principal components (PC) used in the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) with group as the output (task i). Note the lack of classification performance improvement with a higher number of PC.
Supplementary Fig.2Correct classification rates overall (thick black line) and by sample Day (thin coloured lines) as a function of the number of principal components (PC) used in the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) with sampling Day as the output (task ii).
Supplementary Fig. 3Correct classification rates overall (thick black line) and for all Days x horse combinations (thin lines, coloured by day, with circles for osteoarthritis (OA), and triangles for Sham) as a function of the number of principal components (PC) used in the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) for task iii.
References
- 1.Anderson D.D., Chubinskaya S., Guilak F., Martin J.A., Oegema T.R., Olson S.A., et al. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: improved understanding and opportunities for early intervention. J. Orthop. Res. 2011;29:802–809. doi: 10.1002/jor.21359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goldring M., Goldring S. Osteoarthritis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007;213:626–634. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Loeser R.F. Age-related changes in the musculoskeletal system and the development of osteoarthritis. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2010;26:371–386. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cross M., Smith E., Hoy D., Nolte S., Ackerman I., Fransen M., et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2014;73:1323–1330. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Altman R.D., Abramson S., Bruyère O., Clegg D., Herrero-Beaumont G., Maheu E., et al. Commentary: osteoarthritis of the knee and glucosamine. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:963–966. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Carmona L., Ballina J., Gabriel R., Laffon A. The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the general population of Spain: results from a national survey. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2001;60:1040–1045. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.11.1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Van Saase J., Van Romunde L., Cats A., Vandenbroucke J., Valkenburg H. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 1989;48:271–280. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.4.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jafarzadeh S.R., Felson D.T. Updated estimates suggest a much higher prevalence of arthritis in United States adults than previous ones. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:185–192. doi: 10.1002/art.40355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kane A.J., Traub-Dargatz J., Losinger W.C., Garber L.P. The occurrence and causes of lameness and laminitis in the US horse population. AAEP Proceedings. 2000;46:277–280. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oke S.L., McIlwraith C.W. Review of the economic impact of osteoarthritis and oral joint-health supplements in the horse. Proceedings of the Am. Ass. Eq. Prac. 2010;562010:12–18. 12-18. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kanamoto T., Mae T., Yokoyama T., Tanaka H., Ebina K., Nakata K. Significance and definition of early knee osteoarthritis. Annals of Joint. 2019;5 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Frisbie D., Al-Sobayil F., Billinghurst R., Kawcak C., McIlwraith C. Changes in synovial fluid and serum biomarkers with exercise and early osteoarthritis in horses. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:1196–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Frisbie D., Ghivizzani S., Robbins P., Evans C.H., McIlwraith C. Treatment of experimental equine osteoarthritis by in vivo delivery of the equine interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene. Gene Ther. 2002;9:12. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Frisbie D., Kawcak C., Baxter G., Trotter G., Powers B., Lassen E., et al. Effects of 6 alpha-methylprednisolone acetate on an equine osteochondral fragment exercise model. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1998;59:1619–1628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Frisbie D., Kawcak C., Trotter G., Powers B., Walton R., McIlwraith C. Effects of triamcinolone acetonide on an in vivo equine osteochondral fragment exercise model. Equine Vet. J. 1997;29:349–359. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Frisbie D., Ray C., Ionescu M., Poole A., Chapman P., McIlwraith C. Measurement of synovial fluid and serum concentrations of the 846 epitope of chondroitin sulfate and of carboxy propeptides of type II procollagen for diagnosis of osteochondral fragmentation in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1999;60:306–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Legrand C.B., Lambert C.J., Comblain F.V., Sanchez C., Henrotin Y.E. Review of soluble biomarkers of osteoarthritis: lessons from animal models. Cartilage. 2017;8:211–233. doi: 10.1177/1947603516656739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Garner B.C., Stoker A.M., Kuroki K., Evans R., Cook C.R., Cook J.L. Using animal models in osteoarthritis biomarker research. J. Knee Surg. 2011;24:251–264. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kraus V.B., Blanco F., Englund M., Henrotin Y., Lohmander L., Losina E., et al. OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: soluble biomarker assessments in clinical trials in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:686–697. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.van Spil W., Szilagyi I. Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: biomarkers (biochemical markers) Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020;28:296–315. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kawcak C., Frisbie D., Werpy N., Park R., McIlwraith C. Effects of exercise vs experimental osteoarthritis on imaging outcomes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:1519–1525. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Frisbie D.D.M.C.W., de Grauw J.C. In: Joint Disease in the Horse. second ed. McIlwraith C.W., Frisbie D.D., Kawcak C.E., van Weeren P.R., editors. 2016. Synovial fluid and serum biomarkers. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Laverty S. 2008. What Biomarkers Are Telling Us and the Challenges Ahead. Havemeyer Foundation Monograph Series No. 22 - Equine Musculoskeletal Biomarkers. 14. [Google Scholar]
- 24.McIlwraith C. Use of synovial fluid and serum biomarkers in equine bone and joint disease: a review. Equine Vet. J. 2005;37:473–482. doi: 10.2746/042516405774480102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mobasheri A., Bay-Jensen A.-C., Van Spil W., Larkin J., Levesque M. Osteoarthritis Year in Review 2016: biomarkers (biochemical markers) Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017;25:199–208. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Frisbie D., Mc Ilwraith C., Arthur R., Blea J., Baker V., Billinghurst R. Serum biomarker levels for musculoskeletal disease in two-and three-year-old racing thoroughbred horses: a prospective study of 130 horses. Equine Vet. J. 2010;42:643–651. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.van Weeren P.R., Firth E.C. Future tools for early diagnosis and monitoring of musculoskeletal injury: biomarkers and CT. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2008;24:153–175. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Smith B.C. CRC press; 2011. Fundamentals of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. [Google Scholar]
- 29.McIlwraith CW. From arthroscopy to gene therapy - 30 years of looking in joints. In: Brokken TD Ed. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, Seattle, Washington, USA, 3-7 December 2005:65-113.
- 30.Elsohaby I., Hou S., McClure J.T., Riley C.B., Shaw R.A., Keefe G.P. A rapid field test for the measurement of bovine serum immunoglobulin G using attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy. BMC Vet. Res. 2015;11:218. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0539-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hou S., Riley C.B., Mitchell C.A., Shaw R.A., Bryanton J., Bigsby K., et al. Exploration of attenuated total reflectance mid-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibration to measure immunoglobulin G in human sera. Talanta. 2015;142:110–119. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Canvin J., Bernatsky S., Hitchon C., Jackson M., Sowa M., Mansfield J., et al. Infrared spectroscopy: shedding light on synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2003;42:76–82. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Eysel H., Jackson M., Nikulin A., Somorjai R., Thomson G., Mantsch H. A novel diagnostic test for arthritis: multivariate analysis of infrared spectra of synovial fluid. Biospectroscopy. 1997;3:161–167. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shaw R., Kotowich S., Eysel H., Jackson M., Thomson G., Mantsch H. Arthritis diagnosis based upon the near-infrared spectrum of synovial fluid. Rheumatol. Int. 1995;15:159–165. doi: 10.1007/BF00301774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Staib A., Dolenko B., Fink D., Früh J., Nikulin A., Otto M., et al. Disease pattern recognition testing for rheumatoid arthritis using infrared spectra of human serum. Clinica chimica acta. 2001;308:79–89. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(01)00475-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Riley C.B., Laverty S., Hou S., Shaw R.A. Infrared-based detection of an osteoarthritis biomarker signature in the serum of rabbits with induced osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:A82–A83. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stiebel M., Miller L.E., Block J.E. Post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis in the young patient: therapeutic dilemmas and emerging technologies. Open Access J. Sports Med. 2014;5:73. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S61865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vijarnsorn M., Riley C.B., Shaw R.A., McIlwraith C.W., Ryan D.A., Rose P.L., et al. Use of infrared spectroscopy for diagnosis of traumatic arthritis in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2006;67:1286–1292. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.67.8.1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Malek S., Sun H., Rochat M., Béraud R., Bailey T., Wright G., et al. Infrared spectroscopy of serum as a potential diagnostic screening approach for naturally occurring canine osteoarthritis associated with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020;28:231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vijarnsorn M., Riley C.B., Ryan D.A., Rose P.L., Shaw R.A. Identification of infrared absorption spectral characteristics of synovial fluid of horses with osteochondrosis of the tarsocrural joint. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2007;68:517–523. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Paraskevaidi M., Hook P., Morais C., Anderson J., White R., Martin-Hirsch P., et al. Attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy to diagnose osteoarthritis in equine serum. Equine Vet. J. 2020;52:46–51. doi: 10.1111/evj.13115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Barnes R., Dhanoa M.S., Lister S.J. Standard normal variate transformation and de-trending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Appl. Spectrosc. 1989;43:772–777. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Barker M., Rayens W. Partial least squares for discrimination. J. Chemometr.: A Journal of the Chemometrics Society. 2003;17:166–173. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rohart F., Gautier B., Singh A., Lê Cao K.-A. mixOmics: an R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Coates J. In: Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. Meyers R.A., editor. John Wiley and Sons Ltd; Chichester, UK: 2000. Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach; pp. 10815–10837. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Laverty S., Girard C., Williams J., Hunziker E.B., Pritzker K. The OARSI histopathology initiative–recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the rabbit. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:S53–S65. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shaw RA, Mantsch HH. Infrared Spectroscopy of Biological Fluids in Clinical and Diagnostic Analysis 2008.
- 48.Elsohaby I., McClure J.T., Riley C.B., Bryanton J., Bigsby K., Shaw R.A. Centrifugal ultrafiltration of human serum for improving immunoglobulin A quantification using attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. Anal. 2018;150:413–419. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Riley C.H.S., Vijarnsorn M., Shaw R.A. Biochemical variation among normal equine carpal and tarsocrural joint fluids are detected by infrared spectral characteristics and A modified approach to linear discriminant analysis. GSTF International Journal of Veterinary Science. 2014;1 [Google Scholar]
- 50.Viitanen M., Bird J., Maisi P., Smith R., Tulamo R.-M., May S. Differences in the concentration of various synovial fluid constituents between the distal interphalangeal joint, the metacarpophalangeal joint and the navicular bursa in normal horses. Res. Vet. Sci. 2000;69:63–67. doi: 10.1053/rvsc.2000.0385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.te Moller N.C., van Weeren P.R. How exercise influences equine joint homeostasis. Vet. J. 2017;222:60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Lameness scores of the osteoarthritis (OA) and Sham groups over time (0 = sound; 5 = non weight bearing lameness).
Flexion test scores of the osteoarthritis (OA) and Sham groups over time (0 = normal; 4 = severe).
Effusion scores of the osteoarthritis (OA) and Sham groups over time (0 = normal; 4 = severe).
Median radiographic scores of the osteoarthritis (OA) and Sham groups for osteophytosis (0 = normal; 3 = severe) and lysis (0 = normal; 3 = diffuse/deep) before intervention and at the end of the study period.
Correct classification rates for classification task iii between Day 0 and all group-Day combinations (osteoarthritis (OA) top and Sham bottom).







