Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 25;4(3):100290. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100290

Table 4.

Mean ​± ​standard deviation results comparing two-dimensional (2D) U-Net and U-Net++ segmentations on knee osteoarthritis patient 2D transverse ultrasound images and subsequent three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed segmentations to the corresponding manual gold standard segmentations. The p-value corresponds to a comparison between 2D and 3D segmentation performance.

Method Segmentation Precision (%) Recall (%) DSC (%) MSD (mm) HD (mm) A/VPD (%)
U-Net 2D Transverse 83.9 ​± ​2.6 94.7 ​± ​1.7 88.9 ​± ​1.6 0.23 ​± ​0.03 1.28 ​± ​0.35 13.4 ​± ​9.4
3D Reconstruction 73.2 ​± ​8.6 94.3 ​± ​1.3 82.3 ​± ​6.1 0.44 ​± ​0.13 1.91 ​± ​0.57 30.1 ​± ​15.6
P-value 0.001 0.598 0.007 <0.001 0.099 0.014
U-Net++ 2D Transverse 84.5 ​± ​5.8 93.0 ​± ​1.0 88.4 ​± ​3.5 0.24 ​± ​0.03 1.18 ​± ​0.43 10.4 ​± ​7.6
3D Reconstruction 72.7 ​± ​8.0 95.0 ​± ​1.1 82.2 ​± ​5.7 0.43 ​± ​0.11 2.02 ​± ​0.64 31.4 ​± ​13.9
P-value 0.002 0.005 0.011 0.037 0.038 0.007