Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 18;13:1048227. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1048227

Table 2.

Effects of calcium peroxide on rape dry matter at the harvest stage under waterlogging conditions.

Cultivars Treatments Stem (g/plant) Fruit pod (g/plant) Grains (g/plant) Total (g/plant)
XY420 WD 13.62 ± 0.45a 17.06 ± 1.71a 17.61 ± 1.80a 48.29 ± 3.48a
C0+WL 3.57 ± 0.26d 6.25 ± 0.84c 4.56 ± 0.51c 14.38 ± 0.91d
C1+WL 8.78 ± 0.59c 11.22 ± 0.4b 7.93 ± 0.21bc 27.93 ± 0.52c
C2+WL 10.30 ± 0.26b 16.10 ± 0.9a 9.39 ± 1.5b 35.79 ± 0.95b
FY958 WD 14.08 ± 2.81a 21.33 ± 2.99a 22.75 ± 2.25a 58.15 ± 4.05a
C0+WL 6.69 ± 1.24b 6.26 ± 0.97c 4.61 ± 1.14c 17.57 ± 2.23c
C1+WL 13.25 ± 0.71a 11.62 ± 0.89bc 12.19 ± 0.77b 37.07 ± 0.81b
C2+WL 14.07 ± 1.00a 17.87 ± 2.13ab 11.38 ± 1.39b 43.32 ± 2.62b

The standard error and significant difference analysis in the table are based on the same cultivar. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 4) of four independent experiments. Different letters after the number indicated that there were significant differences among different treatments (P < 0.05). WD, well-draining, C0+WL, no CaO2 and waterlogging, C1+WL, 594 kg hm-2 of CaO2 in the form of base fertilizer and waterlogging, and C2+WL as in treatment C1+WL but a concentration of 864 kg hm-2.