Table 3.

Effect of calcium peroxide on the accumulation of nutrients and distribution under waterlogging conditions.

Cultivars	Treatments	Stem(mg/plant)	Fruit pod(mg/plant)	Total(mg/plant)
	N
XY420	WD	61.23 ± 0.82a	101.95 ± 12.38ab	163.18 ± 11.56a
	C0+WL	18.68 ± 1.80c	50.59 ± 3.38c	69.28 ± 1.61c
	C1+WL	37.73 ± 2.04b	81.09 ± 3.97b	118.82 ± 3.83b
	C2+WL	40.68 ± 2.71b	112.73 ± 6.83a	153.41 ± 8.75a
FY958	WD	110.93 ± 6.93a	143.82 ± 25.42a	254.75 ± 32.35a
	C0+WL	38.86 ± 1.30c	60.69 ± 1.58b	99.55 ± 0.28c
	C1+WL	79.89 ± 4.79b	101.84 ± 3.54ab	181.73 ± 1.26b
	C2+WL	74.79 ± 4.27b	117.25 ± 9.28a	192.04 ± 5.32b
	P
XY420	WD	18.36 ± 0.64a	48.22 ± 5.17a	66.58 ± 4.26a
	C0+WL	5.92 ± 0.06c	22.03 ± 0.37b	27.95 ± 0.42c
	C1+WL	12.91 ± 0.95b	41.78 ± 6.13a	54.69 ± 6.26ab
	C2+WL	10.89 ± 0.40b	37.46 ± 3.40a	48.35 ± 3.20b
FY958	WD	31.33 ± 6.18a	48.39 ± 1.38a	79.71 ± 4.80a
	C0+WL	7.50 ± 1.21b	20.95 ± 0.50b	28.44 ± 1.70c
	C1+WL	25.56 ± 1.56a	27.56 ± 1.60b	53.11 ± 3.05b
	C2+WL	24.46 ± 0.15a	52.34 ± 7.34a	76.79 ± 7.18a
	K
XY420	WD	154.16 ± 5.99a	203.71 ± 14.22a	357.87 ± 20.21a
	C0+WL	4.62 ± 0.80c	72.19 ± 1.34c	77.51 ± 1.95d
	C1+WL	24.75 ± 4.19c	114.59 ± 7.13b	139.34 ± 6.17c
	C2+WL	109.45 ± 8.49b	177.23 ± 8.06a	286.69 ± 1.55b
FY958	WD	244.37 ± 0.13a	283.04 ± 0.7a	527.41 ± 0.83a
	C0+WL	2.77 ± 0.54c	80.77 ± 10.1d	83.54 ± 10.64d
	C1+WL	61.98 ± 2.46b	136.37 ± 8.25c	198.34 ± 5.79c
	C2+WL	229.60 ± 11.05a	179.03 ± 10.93b	408.63 ± 0.13b

The standard error and significant difference analysis in the table are based on the same cultivar. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 4) of four independent experiments. Different letters after the number indicated that there were significant differences among different treatments (P < 0.05). WD, well-draining, C0+WL, no CaO₂ and waterlogging, C1+WL, 594 kg hm^-2 of CaO₂ in the form of base fertilizer and waterlogging, and C2+WL as in treatment C1+WL but a concentration of 864 kg hm^-2.