Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar 25;10(5):819–845. doi: 10.1177/21677026211072232

Table 2.

Questions for Collaborative Inquiry

Trainee roles
➢ To what extent does this site rely on trainees for its functioning, and (particularly for consortiums) how consistent is this across rotation sites?
➢ How does this site decide whether interns are essential personnel?
➢ How do the rights, benefits, and obligations of interns reflect their status as trainees, versus their status as workers, in our system?
➢ How do the rights, benefits, and obligations of interns differ from those of clinical faculty and/or trainees from other disciplines at our site (e.g., medical residents)?

Requirements
➢ Are there hours-based requirements currently in place in this training setting? If so: (a) What provisions exist to balance quality of hours with quantity of hours? (b) Are there any trainees at a disadvantage for meeting these requirements?
➢ To what extent do we prioritize competency-based training?
➢ What are we doing to ensure that our definitions and measurement of competency are unbiased and support the growth of all trainees?

Aims
➢ Who determines the training aims for this internship (or its rotations?)
➢ How are changes in training aims decided upon, and how much input do trainees have in these changes?
➢ When trainees’ training aims change, what process do we have for evaluating how these changes may impact their future career aims?

Locality
➢ To what extent is locality mandated by the training program, and what are the reasons for these mandates?
➢ How are these reasons balanced with the priorities of ensuring quality care delivery for patients, the safety and wellbeing of trainees, and the quality of training?
➢ Are there different policies for hybrid/remote work for trainees and clinicians at this site? If so, why?
➢ What does our program do to support trainees who have relocated from out of state and have few local connections?

Telehealth
➢ What is the culture around telework in this internship environment? What are implicit or explicit biases surrounding remote telework?
➢ How does this site make use of competencies focused on telehealth provision for trainees, and on telesupervision for supervisors?
➢ Are trainees with different personal circumstances afforded equivalent opportunities for participating in telehealth and, if not, what barriers do they experience?

Economic Security
➢ How do trainee salaries compare to the median income for the internship site’s location?
➢ What kind of safety net is available to trainees who experience sudden life disruptions (e.g., illness, disability, death of a loved one)?
➢ Are interns treated as employees, entitled to workers’ compensation and leave benefits? Why or why not?

Supporting Diverse Trainees
➢ What opportunities exist for trainees from under privileged backgrounds to voice concerns about inequities in a way that is heard and responded to by the training program?
➢ In what ways does our training program model a commitment to equity, beyond statements and advertisement? What concrete actions are being taken to increase equity in the program?
➢ What resources, supportive spaces, systems, and staff facilitate antiracist action within the organizational culture and policies, and among interns and faculty?

Collaborative Decision-Making
➢ In the culture of the internship training program, what are the norms and expectations about trainees’ inclusion, valuation, and involvement in decision-making?
➢ What are the barriers to including interns as collaborators in making decisions that have impacts on training or clinical care?
➢ How does the internship ensure that it is receiving and integrating feedback from interns about topics that matter for interns?