Table 2.

Results of FWE-cluster level significant post-hoc t-tests.

		MNI coordinates
	H	x	y	z	t	k cluster	p FWE cluster level
HC vs. diagnostic group
HC > MDD
35% hippocampus	L	−30	−31.5	−12	4.63	1554	0.033
15% parahippocampal gyrus
14% fusiform gyrus
HC > SSD
29% superior temporal gyrus	R	63	−1.5	4.5	5.31	8239	8.29*10−9 a
19% central operculum
17% middle temporal gyrus
30% central operculum	L	−46.5	4.5	−1.5	5.23	2315	0.0009b
27% frontal operculum
25% anterior insula
41% fusiform gyrus	L	−37.5	−31.5	−13.5	4.95	3420	6.27*10−5 c
15% hippocampus
11% parahippocampal gyrus
76% thalamus proper	B	−3	−12	15	4.85	1708	0.004d
Differences between diagnostic groups
MDD < BD
34% medial orbital gyrus	R	9	21	−10.5	4.45	961	0.041
28% subcallosal area
21% anterior cingulate gyrus
MDD > SSD
78% fusiform gyrus	L	−37.5	−33	−24	5.81	1196	0.02e
11% occipital fusiform gyrus
10% inferior temporal gyrus
69% fusiform gyrus	R	36	−13.5	−34.5	4.59	1695	0.006
31% inferior temporal gyrus
BD > SSD
68% fusiform gyrus	R	37.5	−37.5	−21	4.88	1769	0.004f
24% exterior cerebellum
26% medial frontal cerebrum (R)	B	6	24	−12	4.67	1671	0.005g
19% anterior cingulate gyrus (B)
18% superior medial frontal gyrus (R)

Only areas ≥10% are included. Letters indicate clusters which were also significant at FWE peak level.

H hemisphere, R right, L left, B bilateral.

^aalso significant at p < 0.05 FWE peak-level corrected, k = 571, p = 0.002.

^balso significant at p < 0.05 FWE peak-level corrected, k = 164, p = 0.003.

^calso significant at p < 0.05 FWE peak-level corrected, k = 81, p = 0.009.

^dalso significant at p < 0.05 FWE peak-level corrected, k = 41, p = 0.015.

^ealso significant at p < 0.05 FWE peak-level corrected, k = 113, p = 0.0001.

^falso significant at p < 0.05 FWE peak-level corrected, k = 48, p = 0.003.

^galso significant at p < 0.05 FWE peak-level corrected, k = 19, p = 0.031.