Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 2;13:7440. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35080-0

Fig. 9. Framework of anterograde signaling for the nuclear control of plastid transcription.

Fig. 9

Monochromatic far-red, red, and blue light – which are perceived by PHYA, PHYA/PHYB (PHYA/B), and CRY1/CRY2 (CRY1/2), respectively – can individually initiate anterograde signaling by blocking the accumulation and activity of PIF1, PIF3, PIF4, and PIF5. PHYs and CRYs inhibit PIFs either directly via physical interaction or indirectly by attenuating the activity of COP1-SPA- and COP10-DET1-containing CUL4-based E3 ubiquitin ligases, which stabilize PIFs and also EIN3/EIL1. PIFs simultaneously repress both PhANGs and PhAPGs via parallel mechanisms. While PIFs work with EIN3/EIL1 to repress PhANGs in the nucleus, PIFs alone separately control the activation of the PEP in plastids by repressing the expression of four light-inducible SIGs, SIG1, SIG3, SIG5, and SIG6. PIFs likely repress SIGs indirectly via a yet unknown PIF-induced factor X. During early seedling establishment, anterograde signaling is suppressed by a developmental signal independently of PIFs. Several dual-targeted proteins, including RCB, NCP, HMR/PAP5/pTAC12 and PAP8/pTAC6, participate in the regulation of anterograde signaling in both the nucleus and plastids.