Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 2;12:20796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25260-9

Table 3.

Results of applying growth evaluation algorithm to an indoor image.

Size (pixel) Object number Measured diameter (mm) Predicted diameter (mm) Error (mm) Error rate (%)
Small (0–22 × 22) 11 33.64 31.57 2.07 6.15
Average 33.64 31.57 2.07 6.15
Medium (22 × 22–34 × 34) 1 35.26 33.95 1.31 3.72
2 36.73 32.63 4.10 11.16
3 34.23 35.14 0.91 2.66
4 34.82 36.07 1.25 3.59
5 36.03 36.48 0.45 1.25
7 33.94 29.85 4.09 12.05
8 35.03 33.45 1.58 4.51
9 34.77 34.80 0.03 0.09
13 34.73 35.34 0.61 1.76
17 35.78 32.69 3.09 8.64
18 34.02 37.33 3.31 9.73
19 34.97 35.09 0.12 0.34
20 34.96 33.60 1.36 3.89
21 35.47 34.49 0.98 2.76
22 34.55 27.03 7.52 21.77
25 33.66 34.08 0.42 1.25
26 34.83 36.43 1.60 4.59
27 35.58 38.50 2.92 8.21
29 34.52 37.99 3.47 10.05
Average 34.94 34.47 2.05 5.90
Large(34 × 34 ~) 14 33.35 36.02 2.67 8.01
15 35.66 37.66 2.00 5.61
16 35.47 34.87 0.60 1.69
23 34.60 36.14 1.54 4.45
24 37.32 35.45 1.87 5.01
30 34.05 37.17 3.12 9.16
Average 35.08 36.22 1.97 5.66