Comparison 1. Exercise therapy versus conventional physiotherapy.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 'Successful treatment'	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
1.1 Follow‐up 16 weeks, per‐protocol analysis	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Follow‐up 8 to 12 years, per‐protocol analysis	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.3 Follow‐up 8 to 12 years, intention‐to‐treat analysis	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Patients' subjective global assessment (better or much better)	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
2.1 Follow‐up 16 weeks, per‐protocol analysis	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Follow‐up 16 weeks, intention‐to‐treat analysis	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.3 Follow‐up 8 to 12 years, per‐protocol analysis	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.4 Follow‐up 8 to 12 years, intention‐to‐treat analysis	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Return to sports	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
3.1 Per‐protocol analysis	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 Intention‐to‐treat analysis	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]