Zhou 2002.
Methods | Design: randomised controlled trial. Multi‐centre or single‐centre: single‐centre.Period: not reported. Sample size calculation: not reported. Generation of allocation: random numbers table. Allocation concealment: not reported.Blinded assessment of treatment allocation: not reportedWithdrawals: no withdrawals. Intention‐to‐treat analysis: not reported.Follow‐up: not reported | |
Participants | 30 recruited: 15 in each group Mean age: treatment group 42 ± 3.4 years; control group 36.8 ± 4.6 years Mean total burn surface area (TBSA): treatment group 66.1 ± 5.2% with 38.1 ± 6.2% TBSA, 3rd‐degree burns; control group 62.6 ± 8.1% with 36.6 ± 4.8% TBSA, 3rd‐degree burns Inclusion criteria: admission to the burn unit within 6 hours post injury, TBSA 30% to 60%, 3rd‐degree burn > 20% TBSA, age 18 to 60 years Exclusion criteria: inhalation injury |
|
Interventions |
Experimental (n = 15): glutamine dipeptide powder 0.5 g/kg/d (oral with warm water). Treatment lasted 12 days. 2nd‐degree and 3rd‐degree burn wounds received SD‐Ag. Most 3rd‐degree burn wounds received escharotomy and skin grafting on day 5 post injury. Participants in shock received fluid resuscitation Control (n = 15): Same amount of placebo was given according to the same instructions as for the treatment group. All other interventions were the same |
|
Outcomes | Length of stay Wound healing |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers table |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants analysed |
Other bias | High risk | ITT not reported, sample size calculation not reported |