Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 23;2014(12):CD007174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007174.pub2

Zhou 2002.

Methods Design: randomised controlled trial. Multi‐centre or single‐centre: single‐centre.Period: not reported. Sample size calculation: not reported. Generation of allocation: random numbers table. Allocation concealment: not reported.Blinded assessment of treatment allocation: not reportedWithdrawals: no withdrawals. Intention‐to‐treat analysis: not reported.Follow‐up: not reported
Participants 30 recruited: 15 in each group
Mean age: treatment group 42 ± 3.4 years; control group 36.8 ± 4.6 years
Mean total burn surface area (TBSA): treatment group 66.1 ± 5.2% with 38.1 ± 6.2% TBSA, 3rd‐degree burns; control group 62.6 ± 8.1% with 36.6 ± 4.8% TBSA, 3rd‐degree burns
Inclusion criteria: admission to the burn unit within 6 hours post injury, TBSA 30% to 60%, 3rd‐degree burn > 20% TBSA, age 18 to 60 years
Exclusion criteria: inhalation injury
Interventions Experimental (n = 15): glutamine dipeptide powder 0.5 g/kg/d (oral with warm water). Treatment lasted 12 days. 2nd‐degree and 3rd‐degree burn wounds received SD‐Ag. Most 3rd‐degree burn wounds received escharotomy and skin grafting on day 5 post injury. Participants in shock received fluid resuscitation
Control (n = 15): Same amount of placebo was given according to the same instructions as for the treatment group. All other interventions were the same
Outcomes Length of stay
Wound healing
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random numbers table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All participants analysed
Other bias High risk ITT not reported, sample size calculation not reported