Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 4;14:185. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00955-1

Table 2.

Association between HGI quartiles and SUA levels

HGI Univariate analysis Multivariate analysisa
β(SE) P β(SE) P
DM Women (N = 682)
Q1 Ref Ref
Q2 − 14.2(8.3) 0.10 − 12.8(7.7) 0.10
Q3 0.6(8.3) 0.49 5.3(7.7) 0.49
Q4 − 30.4(8.3)  < 0.001* − 29.1(7.8)  < 0.001*
P trend 0.004* 0.006*
Non-DM women (N = 14262)
Q1 Ref Ref
Q2 1.9(1.5) 0.22 1.3(1.4) 0.34
Q3 6.1(1.5)  < 0.001* 3.4(1.4) 0.01*
Q4 17.2(1.5)  < 0.001* 8.9(1.4)  < 0.001*
P trend  < 0.001*  < 0.001*
DM men (N = 1681)
Q1 Ref Ref
Q2 1.5(6.0) 0.81 0.05(5.7) 0.99
Q3 0.2(6.0) 0.97 − 2.5(5.7) 0.66
Q4 − 9.8(6.0) 0.10 − 12.9(5.8) 0.03*
P trend 0.11 0.02*
Non-DM men (N = 14147)
Q1 Ref Ref
Q2 − 0.07(1.9) 0.97 − 1.4(1.8) 0.42
Q3 1.2(1.9) 0.55 0.1(1.8) 0.96
Q4 1.3(1.9) 0.51 − 2.4(1.8) 0.18
P trend 0.41 0.32

HGI hemoglobin glycation index, SUA serum uric acid, DM diabetes mellitus, SE standard error, Ref reference, others are the same with Table 1

aAdjusted for age, BMI, HGB, TC, LDL-C, TG, BUN, Hcy, hypertension, and dyslipidemia

*P < 0.05