Table 2.
Alpha diversity analysis of Chinese chives rhizosphere microorganisms under different fertilization treatments.
| Treatments | Chao1 | Ace | Shannon | Simpson | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | CK | 7252.30 ± 106.53ab | 7362.36 ± 147.17b | 7.45 ± 0.08a | 0.0015 ± 0.0003b | 0.9803 ± 0.0019a |
| T1 | 7625.47 ± 743.35ab | 7938.58 ± 894.14ab | 7.20 ± 0.18ab | 0.0021 ± 0.0006a | 0.9767 ± 0.0027a | |
| T2 | 8050.91 ± 296.36a | 8305.31 ± 351.33a | 7.40 ± 0.05a | 0.0015 ± 0.0001b | 0.9756 ± 0.0013a | |
| T3 | 7671.26 ± 500.70ab | 7892.62 ± 658.19ab | 7.34 ± 0.03ab | 0.0016 ± 0.0005ab | 0.9772 ± 0.0024a | |
| T4 | 7283.49 ± 289.79ab | 7508.95 ± 359.28b | 7.30 ± 0.09ab | 0.0019 ± 0.0003ab | 0.9792 ± 0.0033a | |
| Fungi | CK | 570.08 ± 19.10a | 565.24 ± 23.46a | 4.29 ± 0.09a | 0.0270 ± 0.0035b | 0.9988 ± 0.0003a |
| T1 | 425.69 ± 50.14b | 422.23 ± 51.78b | 3.88 ± 0.13a | 0.0394 ± 0.0052b | 0.9994 ± 0.0001a | |
| T2 | 420.31 ± 10.36b | 413.10 ± 8.80b | 3.97 ± 0.03a | 0.0359 ± 0.0017b | 0.9995 ± 0.0000a | |
| T3 | 439.45 ± 33.19b | 435.35 ± 31.28b | 3.59 ± 0.13ab | 0.0591 ± 0.0067b | 0.9991 ± 0.0003a | |
| T4 | 438.16 ± 38.20b | 438.35 ± 38.46b | 3.07 ± 0.49b | 0.1829 ± 0.0120a | 0.9987 ± 0.0007a |
Chao1, ACE, Shannon, Simpson represent each index respectively; Values are reported as repeated mean ± standard error. According to Duncan’s test, the average of the different letters (such as a, b, and c) in each column was significantly different at p < 0.05. Coverage is the coverage rate of the sample library. CK, no fertilizer application; T1, conventional fertilizer application; T2, reduced fertilizer application for slow-release fertilizer; T3, conventional fertilizer application for slow-release fertilizer; T4, reduced fertilizer application for conventional fertilizer.