Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;16:1038922. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1038922

TABLE 2.

Comparison of parameters of ARM before and after treatment in TEA group (n = 22) and sham-TEA group (n = 22).

Parameters of ARM Baseline TEA P # Baseline Sham-TEA P P *
Rectal resting pressure 87.00 ± 4.50 84.38 ± 3.46 0.284 84.45 ± 3.78 83.65 ± 2.63 0.788 0.867
Anal maximum squeeze pressure 201.81 ± 13.48 190.16 ± 12.94 0.168 175.54 ± 8.51 166.13 ± 7.80 0.131 0.119
Rectal sensory threshold
 First sensation 55.91 ± 6.02 44.55 ± 4.04 0.014 55.91 ± 5.80 58.64 ± 5.52 0.486 0.046
 Desire of defecation 92.27 ± 6.96 72.72 ± 5.74 0.001 90.00 ± 7.67 95.45 ± 7.67 0.174 0.022
 Urge of defecation 138.18 ± 10.62 113.64 ± 7.10 0.005 125.91 ± 7.75 132.73 ± 7.03 0.096 0.063
 Maximum tolerable volume 177.73 ± 11.47 145.91 ± 7.97 <0.001 164.09 ± 8.26 169.09 ± 7.89 0.316 0.045
Rectoanal inhibitory reflex 18.18 ± 1.07 17.73 ± 1.13 0.329 19.55 ± 1.54 20.00 ± 1.47 0.576 0.228

Rectal resting pressure and anal maximum squeeze pressure are in mmHg; Rectal sensory threshold and rectoanal inhibitory reflex are in ml. P#: TEA vs baseline, P: sham-TEA vs. baseline, P*: TEA vs sham-TEA.